The Garabandal Synod ? Part 2

Garabandal Synod

The Time has come to convene an “imperfect” Synod!


Rome, Dec. 3, 2017 A. D. — With the publication of the recent edition of the Acta Apostolica Sedis, in which documents are included which attempt to exalt the personal heresy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who denies the Apostolic Tradition concerning the discipline of the Sacraments, the time has come to convene a Synod to issue a formal canonical correction of the Pope, warning him in Evangelical and Apocalyptic terms, that if he does not renounce his error, he must be considered by the whole Church as self-deposed from the office of Peter.

Such a Synod will be, in technical scholastic terms, an “imperfect” Synod, because it will be convened by the authority of the Apostolic College without reference to the authority of the office of the Vicar of Christ, who in the present circumstances cannot be appealed to, on the grounds of a conflict of interest.

The correction to be given will however be canonical in the proper sense, because though no one but a proper ordinary can given a canonical correction, when he who holds the supreme office has manifestly and pertinaciously abandoned the Catholic Faith, it remains in virtue of the principal of subsidiarity, that if there be no other earthly authority, that the individual as a private person be corrected by the Church Herself, who is not bereft of the Apostolic Authority merely because of a de facto sede vacante.

Since the Church is a visible society and since She is bound above all by the law of charity and the salvation of souls, it remains a grave obligation of the Sacred Hierarchy in these present and extreme circumstances to seek the salvation of the soul of Jorge Bergoglio and the unity of the Church, by seeking his public refutation of his errors and the renunciation of his heresies.  Failing that, the Church will be torn with schism, with many souls following the great stumbling block placed before them in the words of Cardinal Parolin, who in the AAS claims the private letter of the Pope an the Argentine Bishop is “magisterium authenticum”.

We as Catholics, however, ever holding to the perennial magisterium, the Apostolic Tradition and the Divine Teaching of Our Lord and Master, recognize that no teaching of the Roman Pontiff is magisterium authenticum on account of an external declaration, by whomsoever, that it has this character, but that it is only such when from its internal content it adheres harmoniously and conformably with the Deposit of the Faith!

Therefore what Pope Francis has done in ordering these documents published in the AAS and what Cardinal Parolin has done in issuing his own maliciously false statement must be judged by all true Catholics as manifest acts of pertinacious heretical adhesion to the denial of the Apostolic Tradition, which, in fidelity to Christ Jesus, who declared: “Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine” (Matthew 7:6), has ever taught that the Sacraments must be denied to the impenitent and that the Sacred ministers of the Sacraments must deny them in public to those who live in public sin.

Our Association, dedicated to opposing the errors and heresies of Cardinal Kasper has opposed the errors of Bergoglio from its inception in 2015. We remain committed to this course and therefore solicit the assistance of all to make this imperfect Synod a reality.

We therefore implore all faithful Catholics to urge with the greatest clarity and insistence that the Bishops and Cardinals convene such a Synod and do so at the very first opportunity!

There is no more time left for those who sit on the fence, with those who for the sake of human respect or custom refuse to act out of divine charity and faith, for the salvation of souls, in particular for that of Bergoglio, and for the unity of the Church!

This is not the time to think of your career, your personal reputation, your job, your blog, your website, your ecclesiastical office, etc.. The matter is apocalyptic in every true sense of the word!  Do not by your inaction let yourself be counted among those stars of heaven which were cast down by the tail of the dragon! (Apocalypse 12:4)

Finally, while from the point of view of strict legality, we hold that it is right that Bergoglio not be denied the 3 fold public remonstration due him by canonical tradition, due to the gravity of the crisis we are of the opinion that Catholics may now act as if the Papacy is vacant and that Bergoglio is outside the church as a contumacious and pertinacious heretic, on account of what he ordered published in the Acta Apostolica Sedis, if they but work for the convention of the imperfect Synod out of the motives we have enumerated here above.



My Comment :  The so called “humble Pope Francis”, where are his Supporters ? blinded for 4 Years now, where are these so called “Garabandalist” supporting this Pontificate ? and contacting me in Private about obedience (as if our Lady of the Carmel in Garabandal had asked us to obey even to heresies from our hierarchy) when I was warning them having received from Albrecht Weber some details confirming that this Pontificate was probably related to the Garabandal Prophecies especially the famous “3 Popes then end of times” from the Lady of the Carmel, well they hide and say Nothing, some of them are probably waiting and even Praying for a new conclave to get rid of this Heretic Dictator (well do not dream, before we must live the Fatima 3rd Secret vision)……we are Learning now from this great book (Il Papa Dittatore) that he was even expecting Benedict’s abdication, how is this possible ? well the answer is probably in the question.

Holy Feast of the Immaculate Conception !





16 thoughts on “The Garabandal Synod ? Part 2

  1. the 2019 synod of the amazon appeared to be the synod of the warning as pope francisco was planning to allow married priests in some remote regions of the amazon, which would obviously cause a schism, however the pope emeritus book in defense of celibacy published weeks before the exhortation post-synodal was fundamental to stop this change in doctrine.
    I believe that the risk of schism persists with the autonomous synod of the German Church in 2022, many liberal bishops have already shown that they want to use this meeting to create their own doctrine within the German Church.

  2. Public adulterers can be admitted to the Sacraments. This is now the Church’s Authentic Magisterium. No. The False Prophet sits on Peters Chair.

  3. As we all know Pope Francis is a Jesuit priest. The first Jesuit ever to be Pope.

    One of the great events in Garabandal will happen on the day after the Miracle. The bones of Fr Luis Maria Andreu will be perfectly reclothed in flesh and he will appear as he died in that moment of pure joy. In his bones right now we only see death and decay. That is what the evil one wants us to see.

    In Garabandal Mary tells us that in reality her children do not die no matter how it appears to the contrary. As if to confirm this, Conchita communicated with Fr Andreu in heaven. Fr Andreu began as a doubter of Garabandal. Among his last words on earth on having been given a preview of The Great Miracle he said of The Blessed Virgin “How fortunate we are to have a mother like her in heaven.”

    After the Miracle we will see Fr Andreu as he is meant to be seen.

    Fr Andreu was a Jesuit priest. For me this is no coincidence. The Jesuits take a special and specific vow of obedience to the Pope. In Garabandal Mary placed great importance on obedience to the Church even above obedience to her. There are no coincidences in God’s world. After the Miracle I believe we will see Pope Francis as he is meant to be seen and regarded; as the legitimate and true vicar of Jesus Christ, the visible head of the Church on earth.

    Mary chose Fr Andreu, a Jesuit, to confirm the truth in Garabandal that death has been conquered by her Son. Her Son chose a Jesuit to exercise His authority on earth, the Pope of the end of times and the first Pope of the new times. In my view Pope Francis has exercised his God given authority with integrity and courage.

    A Jesuit through and through just as God called him to be.

  4. You ask the question about Pope Francis “Where are his supporters?” Well here is one. I am one. We are so completely different in our opinion of this man. We are both intelligent so the difference is not due to mental ability. We must be dealing with spiritual ability and one of us must me impaired in this regard. I fear for your soul, you fear for mine. May we always consign our holy fears to the care of Mary. On June 18 1965 Our Blessed Mother said “Pray to us with sincerity and we will grant your requests” My sincere request to Mary and St Michael is that we be preserved from the consequence of genuine mistake and led into truth free of condemnation of ourselves and others and willing to go with changes that must be made when the truth is made clear to all.

    • And she said to me :

      The Girl : Father from whom comes this gift ?
      Aviso : From my Good Friend Joe Crozier
      The Girl : but who is Joe ?
      Aviso : A Great faithful of our Lady of Garabandal, you know there in this village where you were Baptized.

      • Thank you mon frere. Your princess, who received her passport to heaven in Garabandal. Here is a carol from Aotearoa, New Zealand, The Land of the Long White Cloud. It is like a lullaby. Perhaps one night you will play it to the girl as you kneel by her bed.

    • Joe,

      With all do respect. What do you think of a Pope who accepts what Luther had to say? About a Pope who seems to think nothing wrong with liberation theology? Of being fixated with material income inequality? (Since when was Jesus fixated on income distribution in his teaching?) Fixated on materialistic politics? Immigration?

      Don’t you think THE most important thing the vicar of Christ should be focusing on is human salvation rather than politics?

      Christ is logos. He is REASON. He wants us to use reason with our faith, because he himself is REASON. You seem to be abandoning all reason for blind alliance to a more and more obvious heretic in the Vatican. More and more evidence is being shown, but those who are blind refuse to see the evidence that points to truth.

      I pray for you, that the lord opens your mind and allows reason to enter, so you are not led into perdition.

      Matthew 15:14
      14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

      • Hi Mike
        I am busy working so please excuse my short reply. There is no point in further dialogue with you on these details because we see things from a completely different point of view and through a completely different lens. My comment was really for Aviso and for our friendship. I leave you with a short verse I found in a Christmas card
        “Listen for His voice,
        rest in His love,
        and know all is well
        in His Hands.”
        Thank you for your prayer which finds reflection in mine for you. Ephphatha.

  5. The Authentic Magisterium Is Truth, Not a Trademark
    by Christopher A. Ferrara
    December 5, 2017

    As the explosive new book on Pope Francis, The Dictator Pope, makes its appearance as a best seller in both English and Italian editions, the Church is confronted with an astonishing dictatorial abuse of the Magisterium itself by Francis and what some have called his “magic circle” of handpicked ultra-progressivists.

    In yesterday’s column, I noted that Francis has published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis (AAS), his approval of the guidelines for implementation of Amoris Laetitia by the bishops of Buenos Aires (along with the guidelines themselves), accompanied by a papal rescript elevating the formerly “private” letter to the status of an apostolic letter and declaring that it is part of the “authentic Magisterium.”
    This move is a blatant attempt to halt all criticism of AL (including the seemingly imminent “formal correction” by Cardinals Burke and Brandmüller) by cloaking the letter and the guidelines in the language of Canon 752 of the 1984 Code of Canon Law, which (citing Vatican II) provides “[a]lthough not an assent of faith, a religious submission of the intellect and will must be given to a doctrine which the Supreme Pontiff or the college of bishops declares concerning faith or morals when they exercise the authentic magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim it by definitive act; therefore, the Christian faithful are to take care to avoid those things which do not agree with it.” 
    The ploy cannot succeed. Francis’ novelty cannot be part of the “authentic Magisterium” because it transgresses the fundamental divine limitation on papal doctrinal authority as enunciated by the First Vatican Council:

    “For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles.”
    Francis is here claiming to announce new doctrine, overturning the teaching of his own predecessor in keeping with all of Tradition. As the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under John Paul II declared in 1998, the absolution and admission to Holy Communion of public adulterers in “second marriages,” without a commitment to cease adulterous sexual relations, “is intrinsically impossible” and “The conscience of the individual is bound to this norm without exception.” That is because this is a norm “over which the Church has no discretionary authority. The indissoluble nature of marriage… goes back to Christ Himself and is thus identified as a norm of divine law,” and the admission of public adulterers to Holy Communion would violate that divine moral norm.

    Yet Pope Francis purports to introduce exceptions to a norm rooted in divine law for the first time in 2,000 years, and he does so by means of patent moral nonsense.  Recall the pertinent section of the Buenos Aires guidelines:
    “When the concrete circumstances of a couple make it feasible, especially when both are Christians with a journey of faith, one may propose that they commit to living in continence.”…
    “In other more complex circumstances, and when it is not possible to obtain a declaration of nullity, the aforementioned option may not, in fact, be viable. Nonetheless, it is equally possible to undertake a journey of discernment…. [I]f one arrives at the recognition that, in a concrete case, there are limitations that diminish responsibility and culpability (cf. 301-302), particularly when a person judges that he would fall into a subsequent fault by damaging the children of the new union, Amoris Laetitia opens up the possibility of access to the Sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist (cf. notes 336 and 351).”

    First of all, the exceptionless moral norm requiring continence for those involved in “second marriages” is not a mere proposal, but a divinely imposed mandate: Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery.  Adultery is never permissible under any circumstances, and those who purport to divorce their spouses and marry another are, as Our Lord Himself declared, adulterers without exception.

    Secondly, “more complex circumstances” cannot be said to render “not viable” obedience to divine law.  That claim is nothing but situation ethics, which the Church cannot possibly accept.

    Thirdly, “more complex circumstances” is an empty phrase capable of whatever meaning one wishes to impart to it. What constitutes “complex” as opposed to “simple” circumstances?  And who determines this? The authentic Magisterium cannot impose such a vague notion as a moral principle.
    Fourthly, “journey of discernment” is a mere slogan just as meaningless as “more complex circumstances.”  Discernment by whom?  A priest, a bishop, the adulterer himself?  Discernment of what, exactly?  An ill-defined phrase capable of innumerable interpretations cannot be a binding moral principle. 

    In sum, “authentic Magisterium” stands for the truth of Christ and what the Church has always taught in His name and by His authority. It is not a trademark that Pope Francis can blithely affix to his absurd novelties in order to declare them beyond criticism or discussion.

    Never in the entire history of the Church has any Pope dared to abuse the Magisterium in this manner. There have been other papal tyrants in Church history, but never has there been a Pope who tried to tyrannize Catholic doctrine itself by demanding universal submission to his own errant ideas.
    May Our Lady of Fatima intervene soon to rescue the Church from the astounding disaster of this pontificate.

  6. Pingback: The Time has Come to Convene an “Imperfect” Synod! |

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s