Discerning the Construct and the Defeat of the Anti-Church in the Era of the Two Popes

 Crushing the Serpents Head


The article you are about to read is one I have longed to write and let loose on these pages for some time. It is not that I have purposely resisted what must be done, as if tethering this task as one might an unruly prisoner, or confining an immensity of water behind an unmovable damn. No. The reason is far simpler, it is nothing more than not knowing where to begin. A small obstacle you might suppose, but as I soon discovered it was anything but, not least because the subject matter is one that provokes controversy but also because of my apprehension concerning the potential consequences.

Brother Bernard Coleman OFM, an artist and former lecturer at the Royal Academy, once said to me, “there is a very real fear that the artist experiences when facing a blank canvas; it comes from an absence of certainty of  how to do what one intends and to do it well, a simple matter of where should one place the first brush stroke,” In one respect he was saying, the first commitment of paint to canvas will either begin a new work worthy of respect, received with goodwill or be ruinous of the artist’s confidence and reputation. It could be an irrevocable moment for good or for bad. And so, it was, given the topic of this article, I found myself unmovable, unable to begin, until today that is. This evening I opened a UK national newspaper The Daily Mail and read a wonderful well balanced and courageous essay written by A.N. Wilson (his essay can be read via the link provided at the end of this section). On reading this I knew how I should begin, that is, with A.N Wilson’s headline: You MUST believe in gay marriage. You CAN’T question abortion. And as for transgender rights … what began as an admirable attempt to make society kinder has become such a threat to free speech [that] we’re entering THE NEW AGE OF INTOLERANCE.

How does this relate to Fatima, Garabandal and Akita? To start with, these themes when taken in context with the Apparitions are so evocative I am guessing you are already imagining routes to the answer. Sensing who are the players, what is at stake and recalling numerous articles published by concerned clergy, columnists, and contributors to on-line public forums. Having begun intuitively forming an answer the logical and inescapable next step is justification of that which we sense to be true, and we do this through gathering substantive evidence.

This article therefore aims to explain why these particular themes are; implicit within the warnings of  Our Lady of Mount Carmel, are a danger to The Church and the World, and instrumental in provoking the Tribulation, The Warning and if we don’t change a Chastisement. The article will be an ongoing work that will be published in short chapters over a period of several months.

The topics A.N. Wilson identifies as the subject matter of New Age Intolerance are in fact the very same that are now being vociferously directed toward the moral teaching of the Apostolic Church. The moral imperative in this regard is no longer confined to a battle between the various aberrations of atheism and The Church, but has now evolved to become an unholy conflict within The Church Herself.  It is these very same topics that are the insidious foundation of confusion that as prophesied, are now resulting in Cardinals opposing Cardinals etc.

A Trojan Horse has therefore most definitely entered Holy Mother Church, concealing within it the ideologies of Secularism, Communism and Protestantism translated as outreach programmes, inclusivity and compassion. All wonderful concepts in the right context, but this context is not a Christocentric amendment of life and subsequent evangelisation. It is rather an accommodation of mortal sin in perpetuity because in ‘certain circumstances,’ (according to some interpretations of AL) the sinner is bereft of choice. They are the very beachhead challenging revealed Truths governing the fundamental construct of the family, marriage, and the Holy Eucharist. These are the very weapons the Anti-Christ is using in this final battle with the Blessed Virgin Mary hence the significance of relating ‘the new age of intolerance’ to the ’Signs of the Times’ in the context of Fatima, Garabandal and Akita.



Chapter 1

Apostolic Church Under Attack

Let us begin this journey with the prophetic words attributed to Saint John Paul II in his last speech as Cardinal Karol Wojtyla to the US in September 1976:

“We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has ever experienced. I do not think that the wide circle of the American Society, or the whole wide circle of the Christian Community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-church, between the gospel and the anti-gospel, between Christ and the antichrist. The confrontation lies within the plans of Divine Providence. It is, therefore, in God’s Plan, and it must be a trial which the Church must take up, and face courageously.”

The poignant words being: We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-church, between the gospel and the anti-gospel, between Christ and the anti-Christ.

10 thoughts on “Discerning the Construct and the Defeat of the Anti-Church in the Era of the Two Popes

  1. In my opinion a Warning will be in 2018 after the October Synod and Great Miracle will be 11 04 2019. People will have time to prepare for Holy week and Easter.Holy week that will start 18 04 ( holy Thursday). I analysed both Garabandal and Medjugorie. For Garabandal 18 is important but also one of the Medjugorie seer’s said 18 is important and because of some ‘event’ catholics will start celebrating new Thursday 18. It has much in common with Eucharist. As for martyr, 11 04 it is also a feast of St Stanislaw who was murdered while celebrating the Mass. It is also what Aviso suggested once while writing about Maria Saraco.

  2. Hi Domenico

    I think you may be referring to Millenarianism. I believe the catechism is quite explicit in explaining the particular and the general judgement and also that there is not a literal 1000 year reign on earth of Christ being an actual ruler in bodily form on our earth for 1000 years . I think you may be possibly misunderstanding as indeed some of the early church fathers were mistaken on this issue , in regards to periods of peace and a full realization of the truth of Christ and the kingship of Christ on earth .
    I believe Saint Augustine in his book City of God , speaks of this more fully than we have time to discuss on this blog which is obviously more so only for the discussion of the Garabandal prophecies I would refer you to the Catechism about the church’s ultimate trial Article 7 675, 676 . I would of course appreciate any feedback from you in regards to this as I have come to understand there is much debate on this fact even though our catechism states in 676 that it is against any 1000 year reign of Christ on earth.
    I appreciate all of your commentary for the most part and your defense of our faith is often quite wonderful to read and truly you seem to follow the magesterium and her teachings. I think we should adhere to the catechism as it is currently written . Please take no offense from me on this subject as I only want to adhere myself to humility ,love , and faith in Christ , but always to follow and teach what is the truth of Christ and our Catholic Faith. Please excuse me if I misunderstood your writing! Perhaps you can clarify for me and anyone else who may be in questioning on this theology Thank you Domenico. God Bless you.


    • Dear Joseph,

      Thank you for taking the time to write to me. You are my brother in Christ.

      I am indeed a staunch Roman Catholic, but my allegiance will always be with Jesus Christ and his teachings. I pride myself on being impartial, otherwise my conscience would inflict on me great suffering. This means that when there is an apparent discrepancy between the Roman Catholic Catechism and what Jesus Christ Christ reveals in the Bible, then for all intents and purposes I will side with Jesus Christ’s words. When I was a young man, I played soccer. My coach had ingrained in me the idea that “when in doubt boot it out”. This is what I have done since there is an apparent contradiction between the Bible and the Roman Catholic Catechism in this case.

      I say “apparent” for a reason. In my defense, I have just quoted what was recorded in the Book of Revelation about the 1000 years of Jesus Christ’s rule. However, I do acknowledge that Jesus Christ may be a figurehead, that is, he does not rule himself in the flesh, but rather by his hand chosen representative. There is evidence for this in the Book of Revelation. For example,

      (1). Revelation 2:18-29. In these passages with regards to the the Angel of the Church of Thyatira, Jesus Christ said;

      “And whoever will prevail and will observe my works even unto the end, I will give to him authority over the nations. And he shall rule them with an iron rod, and they shall be broken like the earthenware of a potter. The same I also have received from my Father. And I will give to him the morning star. Whoever has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the Churches.”

      Notice, that Jesus Christ says that “The same I also have received from my Father. And I will give to him the morning star.”. What does this mean? What is the morning star? It seems to me that Jesus Christ will personally choose someone to represent his interests on Earth and grant this individual the same authority that lord God Yahweh granted to his son Jesus Christ.

      (2). Revelation 19:11-16. These passages have been interpreted as depicting Jesus Christ as a great warrior. I tend to disagree (my opinion only) because the passages not only mirror the one above, but also gives extra information about the individual that Jesus Christ has personally chosen to represent him on Earth:

      “And I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And he who was sitting upon it was called Faithful and True. And with justice does he judge and fight. And his eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, having a name written, which no one knows except himself. And he was clothed with a vestment sprinkled with blood. And his name is called: THE WORD OF GOD. And the armies that are in heaven were following him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And from his mouth proceeded a sharp two-edged sword, so that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with an iron rod. And he treads the wine-press of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. And he has on his garment and on his thigh written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.”

      There are large amounts of Catholic prophecies that talk about a certain Great Catholic Monarch who seems to fulfill this biblical role.

      I want to now go back to your reference to the Roman Catholic Catechism and expand on it too:

      (a). In the Church’s Article 7, 668-670, it states that Christ already reigns through the Church, that Christ dwells on earth in his Church, that Christ’s kingdom already manifests its presence through the miraculous signs that attend its proclamation by the Church, and hence already has dominion in Heaven AND Earth.

      If this is the case, why is it that the Marian apparitions (La Salette, Fatima, Garabandal, Akita…etc) and countless Catholic prophecies are in disagreement with this Catechism? If Christ already dwells on Earth, then why is it that injustice, greed, wars, adultery, homosexuality, abortions (approaching one billion), heresies and out of control apostasy even in the Church it self reign supreme on Earth today? This Catechism in my opinion is problematic because it makes Jesus Christ look really bad as having no authority at all.

      As it turns out the Catechism Article 7, 671 contradicts the above by stating:

      “Though already present in his Church, Christ’s reign is nevertheless yet to be fulfilled “with power and great glory” by the King’s return to earth. This reign is still under attack by the evil powers, even though they have been defeated definitively by Christ’s Passover. Until everything is subject to him, “until there be realized new heavens and a new earth in which justice dwells…”

      So which is it? The language used here is the language of a politician, who says one thing but means another. You can’t have it both ways.

      (b). In the Church’s ultimate trial Article 7, 675- 676, it sates that:

      “Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh…The Antichrist’s deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgment. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the “intrinsically perverse” political form of a secular messianism.”

      Well hello, the Marian apparitions and Catholic prophecies have warned us against this. The BIG IRONY here is that the church’s ultimate trial Article 7 675, 676 is warning about ITSELF in the form of the reign of Pope Francis.

      Pope Francis is an apostate and a heretic. He is leading “his” interpretation of the Church into great “trials by fire” not only for the Roman Catholic Clergy, but for all the Catholics who obediently follow them.

      For example, consider the prophecies of Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich. Our Lady reveals that there will be a false church of darkness, while the true Church continues to exist. This false church will be an ecumenical church. It will unite all the ecclesial (church) communities and sects together. And there will be a false pope and a true pope reigning at the same time, just as there was during the Great Western Schism in the 14th Century.

      Does this ring a bell to anyone? The Fatima prophesy of there being a Pope and a Bishop in White (another Pope) indicates what is happening today with Pope Francis and Pope Benedict co-existing together.

      Now I happen to believe that the Church is distinct from the “tenants” who administer it. There will come a time when the old tenants will be forcibly removed by Jesus Christ and be replaced with new tenants who are faithful to Jesus Christ and his teachings. Out with the old.In with the new. The first will become last, the last will become first.

      Joseph, you need to understand that the history of the Roman Catholic Church is fraught with situations that were inconsistent with Jesus Christ’s teachings. There was a time in the Middle Ages on the one hand when Popes were war mongers, military generals, and increased its Papal territories through war and violence, and on the other hand during the Renaissance where Popes, cardinals and Bishops were very worldly and valued material things above all, and begat illegitimate children, and had both heterosexual and homosexual affairs.

      There is a lot of politics involved in religions whether it be Protestantism, Catholicism, Judaism and Islamism. You need to put this into perspective. However, you will never go wrong when you are faithful to Jesus Christ and his teachings above all else. Then you can rest assured that you will not be led astray.


      F & T in Christ

  3. Maria. Rest assured, the asteroid is not the Warning, or related to it.

    As confirmed on other pages in responses to this type of query, the Warning is a supernatural event that is felt, what we ‘see’ will be a spiritual experience not temporal. I refer you to the interview with Conchita in 1978 below.

    Note that at About 16:18 minutes in to the interview Conchita states quite clearly “everyone will see…,’ and then corrects herself with ‘everyone will feel it.”

    At the point when Christ will slay the Anti-Christ His sign shall appear in the sky, that is the Sign of the Cross. This is a prophesy predating St. Faustina relating to the End of Time and the creating of a New Heavens and a New Earth. Garabandal is not this, but the end of an era, an epoch in terms of a period in World and Church history. To the best of my knowledge nothing has been mentioned in the Garabandal literature or interviews about the Sign of the Cross appearing in the sky. If you have this evidence please feel free to share it.

    The Chastisement associated with the End of Time may be the same as that spoken of in the Garabandal narrative, although I have my doubts. Our Lady of Mount Carmel on the 18th of October 1961 spoke of a “very great chastisement (that) will come upon us.” Not The Chastisement” as you know there have been a number of very great chastisements, upon civilisations and the World as a whole, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Flood, plagues, world wars, Communism etc. In addition the end of the world chastisement is intimately bound up with the appearing of the Anti-Christ, a miracle worker who will deceive the World in to believing he is God. That person has not yet made himself known if indeed he has in fact been born. Also remember Our Lady promised a time of peace after the Miracle, this could be many many generations. Add to this, the Akita prophesy that speaks of a time that will come before and during the chastisement when our only consolation will be the Holy Rosary and the Sign left by my Son; that can be none other than the Sign at the Pines and the abolishment of the Holy Eucharist.

    Finally take comfort in that we cannot fathom the immensity of God’s Love for every child of creation, no matter how wicked or sinful, and no one is excluded by Him, it is only we who regrettably exclude ourselves from Him.

    God Bless
    P.S. shouldn’t worry too much about the Moon either. The burning heat and the great evaporation will happen one way or another, Moon or no Moon.

    • Dear Pete,

      I want to comment on your last sentence.

      Yes, even when God rebukes us, he loves us very deeply.

      It is when we continue on our sinful lifestyles, and are unrepentant, that we exclude ourselves from God.

      Yes, God rebukes, but he also forgives. For example, when Saul was persecuting Christians, beating them and killing them, in the name of the orthodoxy of the Judaism of the day, what did Jesus do? Jesus engaged with Saul and Saul responded. Saul was repentant for his actions and was converted. Saul became the 12th Apostle, St Paul. And then St Paul became one of the most influential Apostles in Christianity.

      Even when God condemns unrepentant evil people, he does not take pleasure in it. Some of the people go straight to the fires of Hell and remain there for eternity, because they remain unrepentant. The visions of Hell, as depicted by St. Faustina is horrifying. It has given me nightmares. St. Faustina also said that Hell is real, but many people do not believe it, even those in the Clergy of the Roman Catholic Church. It is no wonder that multitudes of Christians in our generation are condemning themselves to the horrors of Hell.

      Thankfully, Purgatory is a way for previously unrepentant sinful Christians to purify themselves after death, They are given the opportunity to join Christ in Heaven. Purification does entail experiencing suffering.

      There are also some people living today, who had lived such sinful lives, but against all odds repented, and were converted to Christ. These people experience Purgatory while they are living. They purify themselves in their suffering to adhere to Christ and their teachings. Experiencing purification and suffering while living is a way to bypass Purgatory after death and go straight to Heaven. If such people are worthy enough, Jesus Christ may resurrect them in the flesh (The “first resurrection” Revelation 20:4-6) and live with Jesus Christ on Earth for a 1000 years in peace.

      By the way, it is after the first resurrection that begins the 1,000-year period of Jesus Christ’s reign on Earth. This will be the fulfillment of the Lord’s Prayer:

      “…Thy kingdom come …Thy will be done…On earth as it is in heaven…”


      F & T in Christ

  4. Hi Maria. Thank you for all of that. You must be a quantum physicist , or some type of astral scientist.?? I have no way of authenticating all of that , but it sure sounds rather ominous. I gather that this would be /may be more of the chastisement , rather than the warning . I believe in the warning, Conchita spoke of , said that nobody would die , except maybe some ( few ) would die of fright.
    I may be over reading or misunderstanding of your writings and words of this event to be shortly here and to bring about much death of radiation and other destruction …. but I also believe we will receive the warning first , in order to deeply examine our lives and to be shown the good we have failed to do , as well as the sin we have and are comitting . This in a sense is Gods great act of Mercy in a warning so that we may amend our lives ..Then within a years time or sooner we would then be given an 8 day advance notice by Conchita of the miracle. Obviously we should always be in repentance living justly , praying and frequenting all of the sacraments as well as the Rosary daily as requested by our Mother Mary.

    Thank you for some clarification on this. Do you think Perhaps these events will take place , but could be further away than anticipated , and not actually hit the moon ? Thank you. God Bless you Thank you also to Peter for your writing and maintaining this blog , with such excellent writing and form. May I also take this opportunity to say hello to AVISIO and to remind everyone to continue in prayer , especially for each other , and that somehow our Pope will lead the church to the fullness of Christ and that our ancient Magesterium will fight to maintain full adherence to the Gospels and all of Christs teachings. Joseph.

  5. Could this asteroid produce de phenomena on the sky that is the WARNING?
    On Oct. 12, 2017, the asteroid 2012 TC4 is slated to whizz by Earth dangerously close. The exact distance of its closest approach is uncertain, as well as its size. Based on observations in October 2012 when the space rock missed our planet, astronomers estimate that its size could vary from 12 to 40 meters. The meteor that exploded over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk in February 2013, injuring 1,500 people and damaging over 7,000 buildings, was about 20 meters wide. Thus, the impact of 2012 TC4 could be even more devastating. “It is something to keep an eye on,” Judit Györgyey-Ries, astronomer at the University of Texas’ McDonald Observatory, told astrowatch.net. “We could see an airburst maybe broken windows, depending on where it hits.”
    In fact, astronomers believe the space rock will more likely pass as far as 170,000 miles (270,000 km), or two-thirds of the Earth-moon distance. If, however, asteroid 2012 TC4 sweeps past us at the closest possible distance, the flyby would be significantly closer than the orbit of TV and other communications satellites, which orbit Earth at 22,300 miles (35,888 km).
    The house-sized asteroid was discovered on Oct. 4, 2012 by the Pan-STARRS observatory in Hawaii. Week later, it gave Earth a close shave when it passed the planet at the distance of 0.247 LD (lunar distance), or 94,800 km. 2012 TC4 is an elongated and rapidly rotating object and has been known to make many close approaches to Earth in the past. Now, the scientists try to determine the exact path of 2017 fly-by and the probability of a possible impact.” 
    The fact that Lord Jesus told st. Faustina, in 1931, that will be a SIGN – CROSS on the sky that will mark the END OF TIME, and Our Lady said the same thing at Garabandal, I thik that could be a COLISION with the MOON; as it is said in Psalm 72: And abundance of PEACE TILL THE MOON is NO MORE.”
    The Reign of the Righteous King.
    A Psalm of Solomon.
    72 Give the king Your judgments, O God,
    And Your righteousness to the king’s son.
    2 [a]May [b]he judge Your people with righteousness
    And [c]Your afflicted with justice.

    5 Let them fear You while the sun endures,
    And as long as the moon, throughout all generations.
    6 May he come down like rain upon the mown grass,
    Like showers that water the earth.
    7 In his days may the righteous flourish,
    And abundance of PEACE TILL THE MOON is NO MORE. “

    What would happen to Earth if an asteroid hit the moon and knocked it off its orbit and we lost it for good?
    “if the force of impact is enough that the fragments of the moon either crash onto earth or are boosted out of earth orbit, then the tides will be gone and the stability of the earth’s axis will be affected” 

    How about saying what problems the tides being gone and the stability of Earth’s axis being effected will cause to the Earth and how bad the tide changes would be for us specifically. You mentioned how it could occur, but not the problems of the tides occurring. 

    “No, there would be no “moon rocks” because the Earth’s atmosphere is so think and hot, that before the rock could reach the Earth, it would have already burned up into ash. There would also be no eclipses because the moon would not be in space to cast a shadow on the Earth or have a shadow casted on.” 

    For a brief moment, the moon would become over 100 times hotter than the center of the sun. The entire moon.  An incredible burst of radiation at all wavelengths would bathe the half of the earth in fire and gamma rays and the moon (and our tarball) would instantaneously become a soup of rapidly disintegrating elementary particles that are blown apart by their own radiation pressure.  In the brief moments in which the Earth and Moon reach thermal equilibrium before disintegrating, the heat transfer to the Earth would obey some form of the Stefan-Boltzmann law for heat transfer between ideal blackbody radiators, assuming that at the frequency of gamma rays being emitted the relative emissivity of each body is basically moot:
    where for the purposes of this estimate the surface areas of the Earth and Moon exposed to each other are one-half of their respective surface areas each (approximately 205 million square kilometers and 19 million square kilometers, respectively).  

    For a brief moment, one half of the Earth would be bathed in 1.14e41 Watts of radiation [7] with intensity peaking at a wavelength of 5.08 picometers [8], well into the gamma ray range.  

    I honestly struggled with a way to contextualize this much energy transfer.  It is 300 billion times the normal radiative emissions of the sun.  The raw power emitted would be equivalent to carpet-nuking the Earth with 0.86 MOLES of the oversized Soviet Tsar Bomba every second [9] or roughly enough to drop 1250 on every square millimeter of Earth. The energy emitted in the first second would be an appreciable fraction of the mass-energy of the Earth and would be 100 billion times greater than the kinetic energy of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

  6. Mary, thank you for your support and recommended reading. Given the Cause for Luisa Piccarreta’s Beatification is still in process please forgive my advising readers to firstly familiarise themselves with the Church’s council as stipulated in The Communique of the Archbishop of Trani of 1 November 2012, which I believe remains current. A synopsis can be read on the EWTN web site via the following link:


    While the Postulation does not have the authority to prohibit the reading of Luisa’s writings that are in circulation, no one is permitted to publish her Diary of 36 volumes. Exceptions have been made for the following writings of Luisa: The 24 Hours of the Passion, The Virgin Mary in the Kingdom of the Divine Will, and her Letters, as well as for the works of Padre Bernardino Bucci about Luisa, [extracted from the EWTN report]

    Mary please feel free to keep us updated on any official progress in this matter

    God Bless

  7. Peter,
    Thank you for your writing on the anti- church of the two popes. All of what you have studied and written about has been explained by Jesus to Luisa Piccarreta in the volumes penned by her between 1899 and 1938. The truths and knowledge of the Trinity and Their one Will are so numerous, overwhelming and fascinating as to completely exhaust one. It has taken us twenty or so years to read and reread the truths that Jesus related to Luisa for our benefit. Jesus told Luisa what has happened in the past, what is happening now and what is going to happen. The events that are to occur have to happen to bring us to the new era, which has begun. Jesus told Luisa that, initially, there will be few who will accept these truths but in the end He will have his army of those who will accept. He said the reason for non-acceptance is disposition. This new era is to occur as did Redemption. The opposition was great at that time and the same is happening now! But it is going to come for the simple reason that the Trinity has decreed it so. One of the most revealing and interesting readings (in general terms) is in Volume 12, January 29, 1919.. These readings can be seen on – catholicdivinewill.blogspot.com. The truths can also be read at a condensed version at – talkluisadivinewill.blogspot.com – Again, Thank you for your interest and love of the Church, Alfred and Mary – fiatluisa@att.net

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s