Another Bad Sign: A Pope Who Will Not Kneel
Before the Eucharistic Lord
by Christopher A. Ferrara
May 31, 2016
On May 26 a Eucharistic procession presided over by Francis took place at the Basilica of Mary Major in Rome. Before the Blessed Sacrament exposed on the altar was a velvet kneeler for the Pope’s use. Francis declined to kneel upon it. He stood before the Blessed Sacrament exposed while priests and altar boys around him knelt in reverence.
In fact, Francis has consistently declined to kneel before the Blessed Sacrament — the Eucharistic Lord — in any context. Not even when he confects the Eucharist himself at the altar; not even during his first Mass as Pope in the Sistine Chapel. Yet he readily kneels to receive the “blessing” of babbling charismatics and to wash and kiss the feet of non-Catholics, including Muslim women, during the rather ludicrous foot-washing ritual with which he has replaced the traditional Holy Thursday mandatum.
Quoting Francis’ predecessor, writing when he was Cardinal Ratzinger, the courageous Antonio Socci openly poses the question to which Catholics the world over would like an honest answer: “Father Bergoglio [as Francis calls himself], do you have a problem with the Holy Eucharist? Do you not know that in Christian spirituality the ‘inability to kneel is seen as the very essence of the diabolical’?” (In this regard, Ratzinger noted a curious detail in all depictions of the devil: the absence of knees for kneeling.)
Socci here recalls “the disquieting affirmations relative to the Eucharist in your [Francis’] visit to the Lutherans in Rome.” On that occasion Francis suggested to a Lutheran woman that the Catholic dogma of transubstantiation was a mere “interpretation or explanation” in contrast with the Lutheran view, and that she should “talk to the Lord” about whether she could receive Holy Communion in a Catholic Church along with her Catholic husband.
Then too, as Socci notes, there is the direct attack on the integrity of the Blessed Sacrament, under the guise of “mercy,” via the suggestion in Amoris Laetitia that in “certain cases” the divorced and “remarried,” who live in a condition Our Lord Himself condemned as adultery, could be admitted to Holy Communion, thus authorizing blatant sacrilege on a mass scale.
In this regard one must recall the report that Francis told an Argentinian woman “married” to a divorced man that she should ignore the advice of her parish priest and receive Holy Communion at a different parish because “a little bread and wine does no harm” — an account neither Francis nor the Vatican has denied. (Father Lombardi’s equivocal and evasive “response”, presented as if it were a denial — a technique in which the Vatican Press Office specializes — was effectively a confirmation of the account.)
What are we to make of a Pope who simply refuses to do what any believing Catholic does instinctively: kneel in humble submission before the Eucharistic Lord? We are confronted here with yet another sign of a papacy like no other before it, signifying a new and perhaps terminal stage in the ecclesial crisis preceding its dramatic resolution — a drama that would not be without calamitous consequences for both the Church and the world.
Thus we must join with Socci in expressing the urgency of “intensifying prayers for Pope Bergoglio: that he might decide finally to kneel, with his knees and with his heart, before the Lord. For the good of his soul and for the good of the Church.”
Source : Fatima.org
My Comment : The Pope will not kneel before the Eucharist Lord as according to his supporters he has a sciatic problem and I am serious but apparently the sciatic problem magically disappears when he is kissing the feet of non-Catholics during the Holy week or receiving the Blessing of heretical Churchs and so on, so what is going on ? well, I was one the first online (2013 via my first blog) not hiding myself to express my cautious with this Pontificate from the beginning, that time Aviso had some kind of own agenda, trying to send his “followers” out of the Holy Church, a kind of schismatic plotter, how many emails and insulting comments I received and receiving still each day because I decided to stand up to date.
But please do not believe that I am proud of myself for being right as objectivily and Respectfully, who cannot see the disaster of this Pontificate since 3 years now, as a Garabandalist de facto well aware of the meaning of obedience to Peter, I am also very sensitive when it’s about the Eucharist, the so called “school of Carmel” I am talking about sereral times on my blog, I have myself a personal story related to the Lady of Carmel and the Eucharist happens to me few years ago in Garabandal directly, what I can say for sure, any disrespect of the Eucharist, the bread of Life, is unforgivable to God and I will suggest to the current Pontiff to kneel as soon as possible and anyway he will, sciatic or not, thank you.
June 05, 2016 Part II
Confusing even the devout: the troubling statements of Pope Francis
June 3, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Two weeks ago the latest controversial interview with Pope Francis hit the press, this time in France with the daily newspaper La Croix. Contrary to the teaching of previous popes, such as Leo XIII in Libertas and Pius XI in Quas Primas, Pope Francis said, “States must be secular. Confessional states end badly. That goes against the grain of History.” In the same interview, Francis suggested a comparison between Christianity and Islamic adherents’ use of conquest to impose their beliefs. “It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of Islam,” he said. “However, it is also possible to interpret the objective in Matthew’s Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in terms of the same idea of conquest.”
The shocking statements reminded me of the very first leaked Q&A with Pope Francis at the beginning of his papacy. It’s an interview remembered most for the pope’s admission that there is a “gay lobby” inside the Vatican. Despite the fact that such explosive news would have been huge for LifeSiteNews, you won’t find that first interview covered on LifeSiteNews anywhere near the date of its release. I simply could not believe it to be authentic or accurate – not because of the ‘gay lobby’ comment – but because the Pope had spoken disparagingly about a spiritual bouquet of rosaries he had received upon his election.
Pope Francis was quoted as saying:
It concerns me; when I was elected, I received a letter from one of these groups, and they said: “Your Holiness, we offer you this spiritual treasure: 3,525 rosaries.” Why don’t they say, “we pray for you, we ask…”, but this thing of counting… And these groups return to practices and to disciplines that I lived through – not you, because you are not old – to disciplines, to things that in that moment took place, but not now, they do not exist today…
“There is no way,” I remember thinking to myself, “a Pope would ever say anything slighting the rosary.” That aspect of the interview made me question whether any of it was authentic. Thus, I resisted the pressure to publish a story on the Pope’s remarks on the ‘gay lobby’ in the Vatican. A few weeks later I was in Rome and finally got a chance to ask someone in the know about the leaked interview. I was shocked to hear: “of course it was true.” It was, I was told, the first example of a new communications method employed by the Pope using different channels.
That sense, of “there’s no way a pope could ever say such a thing,” has resurfaced time and again over the last few years, and not only from the Holy Father’s off-the-cuff and leaked interviews. Even in official teachings such as his Angelus addresses and homilies at big events, Pope Francis has shocked Catholic sensibilities. Such as the Angelus of June 2, 2013, where he spoke about Christ’s miracle of the multiplication of the loaves and fishes as taking place by “sharing.” “This is the miracle: rather than a multiplication it is a sharing, inspired by faith and prayer,” he said.
He was even more explicit about it in July of last year in a homily preached in Christ the Redeemer Square in Bolivia. Pope Francis said, “This is how the miracle takes place. It is not magic or sorcery. … Jesus managed to generate a current among his followers: they all went on sharing what was their own, turning it into a gift for the others; and that is how they all got to eat their fill. Incredibly, food was left over: they collected it in seven baskets.”
There have been many of these jarring incidents. Here is a list of some of them:
– In July 2013 when a reporter asked why during his trip to Brazil he failed to speak of abortion and homosexuality despite the fact that the nation had just approved laws concerning these matters, the Pope replied: “The Church has already spoken quite clearly on this. It was unnecessary to return to it, just as I didn’t speak about cheating, lying, or other matters on which the Church has a clear teaching!”
– In an October 2013 interview with La Repubblica, Pope Francis was reported to have said: “The most serious of the evils that afflict the world these days are youth unemployment and the loneliness of the old… the most urgent problem that the Church is facing.” In the same interview he said: “Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense.” And also: “I believe in God, not in a Catholic God, there is no Catholic God, there is God and I believe in Jesus Christ, his incarnation.”
– The November 2013 Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium was similar to the Repubblica interview in that the Pope focuses on “two great issues” that, he says, “will shape the future of humanity.” “These issues are first, the inclusion of the poor in society, and second, peace and social dialogue,” he wrote.
– In the 2014 book on Pope Francis, The Great Reformer, we learn from papal biographer Austin Ivereigh that Tony Palmer, an Anglican and long time friend of Pope Francis, spoke to then-Cardinal Bergoglio about whether he should become Catholic. Mr. Palmer described the then-Cardinal’s response as: “[Bergoglio] told me that we need to have bridge-builders. He counseled me not to take the step because it looked like I was choosing a side and I would cease to be a bridge-builder.”
– In January of 2015 came the “don’t breed like rabbits” in-flight interview on his return from Manila. Speaking of a woman he knows who was pregnant with her eighth child after having the first seven by C-section, he said he had “rebuked” her, saying, “But do you want to leave seven orphans? That is to tempt God!” “That is an irresponsibility,” he added, “God gives you methods to be responsible.” Pope Francis then said, “Some think that, excuse me if I use that word, that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits.” He added, “No. Responsible parenthood!”
– In March 2015 came another interview with Repubblica in which the Pope seemed to suggest no person could go to hell, but if they fully rejected God they would be annihilated. The article says: “What happens to that lost soul? Will it be punished? And how? The response of Francis is distinct and clear: there is no punishment, but the annihilation of that soul. All the others will participate in the beatitude of living in the presence of the Father. The souls that are annihilated will not take part in that banquet; with the death of the body their journey is finished.”
– There was some controversy over Repubblica’s Scalfari interview. The Vatican would neither verify nor deny it in its specific parts, but nevertheless published it in the Vatican newspaper, and on the Vatican website. It was later deleted from the website, only to republish it again, then delete it again. Vatican watchers compared the most controversial part regarding the impossibility of people going to hell for all eternity to the statement from the Pope’s latest exhortation Amoris Laetitia, in which he said, “No one can be condemned for ever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel!”
– In a February 2016 interview with one of Italy’s most prominent dailies, Corriere Della Sera, Pope Francis praised Italy’s leading proponent of abortion, Emma Bonino, as one of the nation’s “forgotten greats,” comparing her to great historical figures such as Konrad Adenauer and Robert Schuman. The Pope praised her for her work with refugees from Africa. Bonino was famously arrested for illegal abortions and then became a politician who has led the fight for the legalization of abortion, euthanasia, homosexual “marriage,” legalization of recreational drugs, graphic sex education, and more.
– On February 18, 2016 on the papal plane returning from Mexico, the Pope commented on Donald Trump during the Presidential Primaries. “A person who only thinks about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian,” he said, according to a transcript of his remarks. In the same press scrum, the Pope said he would not comment on Italy’s same-sex civil union legislation “because the pope is for everybody and he can’t insert himself in the specific internal politics of a country.”
This small sampling gives enough reason why faithful Catholics who love the Church and the Holy Father are concerned. They are so concerned they are overcoming the natural reticence to criticize the actions of the Pope – the Vicar of Christ on earth. With reverence and love, with prayer and prudence—as well as the pain of children questioning their father—they are beginning to speak with greater boldness, sensing that the result of remaining silent about the current trajectory implies acquiescence and even approval, which would only contribute to the spreading ambiguities about the meaning of morality, faith and salvation.
Source : Lifesitenews.com
My Comment :
If you have not already seen it, may I recommend an article on One Peter Five, called “The Tears of Jesus over Amoris Laetitia” by Josef Seifert, a close friend of Saint John Paul II. In it, he places Pope Francis’ erroneous teaching on mortal sin along side the teachings of Jesus and St Paul. The article is short, to the point and is relayed on the web site via a clip from Gloria.TV. It further affirms why you and so many other commentators are right to raise concerns about this Papacy.
What contempt these men show toward God the Father when they, speaking as the Bride of Christ utter such lies from Her mouth. It is a betrayal of the suffering Lord while nailed to the cross, of Him who allowed Himslef to be crucified for Love of Her. Oh you Bishops and Cardinals what have you done?
Yes I was aware Pete, I receive daily many different articles from our Readers but yours from Onepeterfive.com about the Tears of the Lord and our Lady is touching and unfortunately for us so true, as I said to all of you, this exhortation was heretic and from a heretic, on the same site you can read also another interesting article from the Prefect of the Congregation of the Faith, Cardinal Muller himself talking about the famous and notorious heretical adviser of the Pope,the Archbishop Fernandez as below :
He is behind this exhortation so when your main adviser and ghostwriter is a notorious heretic, why we should still be surprised ? not me and from the beginning but let me give some hope as well, their time is short and the mafiosi of the St Gallen group as their followers will probably end like the king of France but until then we must support this situation a bit longer, the Triumph of our Lady is close, I know it, let’s Pray.
One more time, Frank, the Russians are there to protect the Christians from Islamic State. The Americans, on the other hand, armed the Islamic State and watched passively as they annhialated the Christians and Yazidis. Russia is NOT the enemy.
Hi Emmet, Some insightful news regarding the EU’s concerns over Putin’s expansionist views on the link below.
The web site on other pages also reports on planned joint Russian and Chineese military exercises in the Mediterranean Sea this year ( a bit of a concern); his continued closing down of opposition to his rule and subsequent assassinations; support of the murderous Bashir Assad and an ambition to elect himself another 6 year term in 2018. Yes Putin is seeking to establish traditional Rissian values, but that does not put him on the right side of our Christian faith. Especially in terms of homosexuality given his approach has sparked anti gay vigilante groups roaming the streets and committing murder and other atrocities with impunity. I don’t think it would do you harm to keep a more open mind regarding your view on Putin’s ‘good’ intentions.
I do agree with your view that Obama and Western leaders are leading humanity toward Perdition
Tu-142 F called “Russian Bear” anti-nuclear submarine aircraft and long range reconnaissance plane has repeatedly flown over Syria.
Sorry, Benedict XVI.
Francis is an anti-Pope: he was put into power by paedophile-enabler ‘Cardinal’ Danneels and the other heretics of the Saint Gallen group. Our Lady was very specific at Garabandal: only three more popes after John XXIII. (It later transpired that she had said four, but that one of them would reign for such a short time as to not count. This would be John Paul I. Therefore, the third and final pope after John XXIII was Benedict XIV).
In my opinion it´s not sufficient to become concerned or worried about the Pope Francis´statements or deeds..We ought to start a sort of the lay resistence movement ( as the clergy isn´t interested ) aimed at deposing Pope Francis before it´s too late.You might very soon receive the Eucharist from a woman priest.Don´t be shocked then as the apostasy is picking speed.See here…