En route for the Garabandal Warning ? Part 7 Fatima and Souls

01 May 2017

Pope John XXIII, opening speech at the Council, 1962

“We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world was at hand.”


Washington Plans to Nuke Russia and China

April 27, 2017

Paul Craig Roberts

Not everyone likes to hear about the threat of nuclear war. Some find refuge in denial and say that nuclear war is impossible because it makes no sense. Unfortunately, humankind has a long record of doing things that make no sense.

In previous posts in recent years I have pointed out both written documents and changes in US war doctrine that indicate that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia and China. More recently, I have shown that Washington’s demonization of Russia and President Putin, the incessant lies about Russian deeds and intentions, and the refusal of Washington to cooperate with Russia on any issue have convinced the Russian government that Washington is preparing the Western populations for an attack on Russia. It is obvious that China has come to the same conclusion.

It is extremely dangerous to all of mankind for Washington to convince two nuclear powers that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear strike against them. It is impossible to imagine a more reckless and irresponsible act. Yet this is precisely what Washington has done.

Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff has concluded that Washington in pursuit of global hegemony is implementing an anti-ballistic missile system that Washington believes can prevent a Russian nuclear response to a US pre-emptive attack. http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/04/us-forces-preparing-sudden-nuclear.html

Careful studies have convinced the Russians that Washington is investing in and arranging components that have no other function than to devastate Russia and cripple the country’s retaliatory capability. In short, Washington is preparing to launch a nuclear war. https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/

As I explained previously, the theory behind this insane scheme is that after America’s preemptive strike Russia will be so devastated that Russia would not retaliate with any remaining forces out of fear that Washington would launch a second major strike. Washington also plans to use agents in place to assassinate as many members as possible of the Russian government, thus leaving the government in confusion without leadership.

Yes, the insane American/Israeli neoconservatives are this determined to exercise hegemony over the world.

Yes, Washington is sufficiently criminally insane to risk the destruction of life on earth based on the supposition that Washington’s offense will work perfectly and Russia and China’s capabilities will be so degraded that no retaliatory response will occur.

One might hope that the American and Western populations would be outraged that Washington is so power-crazed that Washington is subjecting all life to such risks. But there is no sign of an anti-war movement. The Western leftwing has degenerated into Identity Politics in which the only threat comes from white heterosexual males who are portrayed as misogynists, racists, and homophopes. The Western leftwing is no longer war-conscious. Indeed, the leftwing has become diverted into such silly irrelevancies as transgender rights to toilets of their choice. The impotence of the Western left is so overwhelming that the left might as well not exist.

Where then is the hope? Russia and China cannot simply sit there and await America’s preemptive nuclear strike.

Possibly Washington does not intend a preemptive strike, but only to convince Russia and China that Washington’s preparations give Washington so much predominance in a conflict that Russia and China will submit to Washington’s hegemony. But this interpretation of Washington’s intention implies no less risk. Why would Russia and China wait for Washington to complete its preparations for war, preparations that permit Washington to turn Russia and China into puppet states?

The US military/security complex has clearly prevailed over Trump’s intention to normalize relations between the US and Russia, and anti-Russian venom continues to pour out of NATO and Washington’s European vassal states. The majority of the American people seem to have accepted the propaganda that Russia is the number one threat to the United States. With propaganda controlling the explanation, Washington’s aggressive actions are explained as defense against a threat and not as a policy that will end life on earth.

The chances are high that life on earth is approaching its end. The responsibility lies heavily on the American people, whose success, due to the mistakes of others, made Americans think that they are exceptional and privileged. Unaware of the inhumane threat to all life that is embodied in the neoconservative claim that Americans are exceptional and indispensable, the self-satisfied American public is unaware of the consequences of such hubris. Hubris is leading them, and the entire world, to slaughter in thermo-nuclear war.

The neoconservative claim of American exceptionalism is the identical claim made for Germans by Hitler. If Americans are indispensable, everyone else is dispensable and can be “bombed into the stone age” as one US government official put it, or nuked as Washington intends to do to Russia and China. The claim of American exceptionalism is not accepted by Russia and China. Therefore, the insane, crazed monsters who rule over the West in Washington are bringing life on earth to an end.

And there are no protests. The idiot British, the idiot Germans, the idiot French, Italians, Canadians, Australians, Belgians, Greeks, Portuguese, Spanish, Japanese, rally behind the insanity that is Washington.


And so apparently do the American people, a population stupid beyond all belief.

My Comment : Within 13 questions :

  1. Is this Scenario possible ? Yes
  2. When ? No one knows when exactly but To me Probably this year or nex Year according to my own research, that’s for the bad news
  3. Can we trust Paul Craig Roberts ? I know him for years via the Fatima Center, so Yes without a doubt
  4. Is this Scnenario related to Fatima ? Yes and more precisely to the Annihilation of Nations indicated in the Fatima 2nd Secret
  5. Can it be avoided ? Yes but with the Consecration of Russia only and at the latest this Year
  6. By whom this terrible scenario can be avoided ? By the Pope of the Catholic Church
  7. Is this Scnenario related to Garabandal ? Yes, more precisely to the Garabandal Warning
  8. Who are responsible ? ALL of us but especially each Pope of the Catholic Church from Pius XI to the current one
  9. What can the faithful do ? Praying especially the Rosary, the Sacrament of the Eucharist (Mass) and the Sacrament of confession then be ready at anytime, to me especially during the Period May 2017 to October 2017 and this explains why I am writting this article today
  10. Is not too late ? After October 2017, it will be probably too late
  11. How can you be sure ? 9 Years with Fatima and 10 Years with Garabandal have been to me sufficient to get probably and unfortunately the good scenario as the good timing
  12. What else ? This scenario was possible during a Pontificate with 2 Popes only, de facto those are the times we are currently living
  13. “We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world was at hand.” ? Unfortunately Pope John was wrong.


Malachi Martin : “What’s wrong, Your Eminence?’ I asked him”

Cardinal Bea : “We’ve just killed a billion people. Look at this!”


1960 : Few minutes after having read the Fatima 3rd Secret



A Last word : Probably one my most difficult article to write.

02 May 2017


Malachi Martin and the Garabandal Warning

Interview with Bernard Janzen about Fr Malachi Martin’s message for our times

I had the honour of interviewing Bernard Janzen, a Canadian Catholic Journalist who during the 1990’s conducted a series of interviews with Fr. Malachi Martin regarding the state of the Catholic Church and the world at the time.  The talks are incredibly interesting and show the great faith that both men have in Our Lord Jesus and His Church.

While many churchmen during that time had been leading a “reform” of the Church; Martin and Janzen were expounding the school of thought that Vatican II had gone too far with its subsequent initiatives and the so-called “spirit” of the Council that many clergy and churchmen used to radically change the Faith and its practice.

The interview is timely because recently the documentary, Hostage to the Devil which chronicles Fr. Martin’s life and his work in the field of exorcism was released on Netflix.  For those of you who wish to examine and further explore Mr. Janzen’s work with Fr Martin his website is www.truimphcommunications.net. The interviews are also available on Youtube.

What did you think of the recently made documentary Hostage to the Devil which examined Fr. Martin’s life and his work in the mysterious world of exorcisms?

This documentary was not produced from a Catholic perspective.  It received funding from the Irish government, examining the life of an Irishman who attained success in the larger world.  Hostage to the Devil was intended for a general audience, thus engaging the scepticism which the general public has about the existence of the devil and exorcisms.  Due to time constraints, the documentary did attempt to cover all aspects of Fr. Martin’s life; it focused on his work as an exorcist.

Hostage to the Devil did a good job of recreating the drama surrounding the mysterious circumstances of Fr. Martin’s death, portraying the heightened emotions of this tumultuous time.  The documentary introduces its audience to Fr. Martin’s unique perspective on exorcism, possession, and the activity of the devil in the modern world.

The documentary gave a platform to Robert Kaiser to malign the reputation of Fr. Martin.  Many of the statements made by Kaiser were not true.  In her book, The Desolate City, Anne Roche Muggeridge describes Kaiser as a journalist who is incapable of distinguishing fact from fantasy.  As a modernist, it could not be expected that Kaiser would have a favourable opinion of a staunch traditionalist like Fr. Martin, but his accusations often descended to the level of calumny.  Kaiser said that Fr. Martin eventually began to believe his own lies.  What lies?  In my years of interviewing Fr. Martin, he made a deeply felt defense of Catholic truth.  I would invite anyone to listen to these interviews and decide for themselves if Fr. Martin was genuine or not.

On balance, the production of Hostage to the Devil is a positive development because it increases the awareness of its viewers of Malachi Martin and his message for our times.

How did you come to do multiple interviews with Fr. Martin in the 1990’s and why are these recordings important today?

I was impressed with the writings of Fr. Martin, especially his book The Jesuits.  During the late 1980’s, Fr. Martin was reaching out to some of the authors of the traditional movement.  Two of these authors helped me to make contact with Fr. Martin, who agreed to do a set of interviews.  The first set of interviews, Catholicism Overturned, was successful and so we decided to do a set of interviews annually, a process which continued until Fr. Martin’s tragic death.

These interviews are important today because they were so prophetic.  He foresaw developments such as homosexual marriage and papal resignation long before they became a reality.  Today, with the Catholic religion in the iron grip of an unprecedented crisis, Fr. Martin’s warnings on the state of the Church are more apparent than they were in the last decade of his life, in the evening of Pope John Paul II’s reign.

Fr. Martin not only explained what was happening.  He explained why these events were happening.  He provided a unique perspective on geopolitical and ecclesiastical events by explaining the critical role of the supernatural realm.

What do you suppose Fr. Martin would say about the current situation in the Church?

He would almost certainly say that events are unfortunately unfolding as he expected.  The modern-day apostasy, or loss of belief, is deepening.  In the last decade of his life, Fr. Martin stated that we are in the early stages of what could be called the great apostasy.  Today, we are in the midst of it.

The Church has recently crossed three thresholds in what Pope Paul VI described as the auto-demolition of the Church.  First, the papal resignation that Fr. Martin prophetically foresaw has happened, diminishing the status of the Papacy.  Monarchs don’t resign; ordinary officials do.  Secondly, there are now open divisions in the College of Cardinals.  Prior to this pontificate, differences in opinion obviously existed, but public disagreements did not exist.  Today, cardinals are publicly taking opposing positions on matters of faith and morals.  Some cardinals state that to give the sacraments to divorced and remarried couples is contrary to traditional practise; other cardinals openly support this innovation.  Thirdly, different jurisdictions in the Church have conflicting rules on a matter of moral discipline.  In Poland, the traditional practice of not giving Holy Communion to divorced and remarried couples is retained.  In the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires, divorced and remarried couples may receive Holy Communion.  This situation of discrepancy on a matter of moral discipline is unprecedented.  Is the Catholic Church still universal?

The core of Fr. Martin’s message remains unchanged.  Fr. Martin is like the Old Testament prophets who rebuked their people for falling away from their faith.  Fr. Martin has rebuked today’s political leaders and churchmen who have departed from the faith of our fathers and decided to go their own way.  In the book The Eternal War, Fr. Martin states, “This new world order is not the rule of God.  It cannot succeed!  It cannot have God’s blessing.”

Fr. Martin was a devotee of Fatima and also spoke of other twentieth century apparitions like Akita and Garabandal.  He spoke often to you about “Our Lady coming in the sky to rescue us.”  Can you elaborate about his thoughts in this area and what it means to our present day.

What I believe Fr. Martin is referring to is the warning spoken of by Our Lady in her appearances at Garabandal.  Fr. Martin believed that Garabandal was an authentic apparition of Our Lady.  According to the warning, there will be some unforeseen astronomical activity.  This is why Fr. Martin has sometimes said to watch the skies.  Everyone at a certain point in time will know the state of their soul.  They will know how they stand before God.  It will be a most frightening experience for many souls.

What do you want people to know about Fr. Martin and his life and times?

Fr. Martin said that when he grew up in Catholic Ireland, one could hardly ever fail, morally or spiritually.  If your parents didn’t catch you, then your school teacher, your neighbors, your pastor, or the local policeman would catch you.  In our day, this idyllic world has been transformed into a hostile environment, where a degenerate culture acts to break down the faith and morals of today’s families.  Fr. Martin’s wide range of experiences and incredible mind enabled him to become God’s instrument in explaining what has happened to our Church and civilization.   No other individual has developed as complete and prophetic an explanation of our times.  This explanation includes the pivotal and largely undetected influence of the supernatural dimension, which of course goes unreported by mainstream media coverage of news events.

Where can one access your work with Fr. Martin to learn further of his life and work?

During the last decade of Fr. Martin’s eventful life, I conducted eight sets of recorded interviews with this incredible mind.  Our apostolate, Triumph Communications, has transcribed these recorded interviews and published them as a box set of eight books, entitled The Wisdom of the Ages.  More information about these books is available on our website at http://www.triumphcommunications.net.  On our website, there are also several articles about Fr. Martin and his message for our times.



07 May 2017

PART 3 Fatima

13 questions sent to me about the Fatima 3rd Secret and my answers :

  1. Do you know the main Contents of the Fatima 3rd Secret ? In my humble opinion Probably or unfortunately
  2. Have you read the text ? No but I worked on this text of 25 lines for almost 10 Years
  3. Is a 3rd World War announced in the 3rd Secret ? Yes as the winner and the loss, probably just before the conclusion of the text In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world”
  4. Is there a timetable in the text ? Yes and related to the Papacy
  5. Why no Pope wanted to reveal this text to this day ? Because the Text talks about some of them as about the Last one before the Consecration
  6. Is Vatican II indicated in the Text ? Yes but not as Vatican II, our Lady talks about a very bad Council (to be diplomatic) and probably at the beginning of the text just 1 or 2 lines after “In Portugal the Dogma of the Faith will be always Preserved….etc…”
  7. Why Sister Lucia had a hart time writting the text ? Because of the Apostasy prophesied within the Church and some strong words from the Blessed Mother about the Papacy
  8. What about the terrible part of the Secret indicated by some Fatima Scholars ? This part concerns Salvation of souls and has been disclosed by our Lady of the Mount Carmel in Garabandal within her second Message
  9. Was Russia Consecrated in 1984 by Pope John Paul II ? No, Russia was never Consecrated as requested by none of the Pope from Pope Pius XI (for example this Great Pope received several requests included from Sister Lucia to consecrate Russia as soon as possible and so on for the next Popes) to the current one
  10. Why ? Pius XI for some Geopolitical Reasons, Pius XII because he was not sure of the exact contents of the 3rd Secret, from Pope John XXIII to the current Pope Because the Consecration is related to the 3rd Secret, if today the Pope Consecrates Russia as requested, he must de facto reveal the Secret or vice versa
  11. What are your sources regarding your personnal research ? in my humble opinion I’ve studied the work of our best Fatima Scholars, from Father Alonso, Father Gruner….etc…to the best French Fatima Scholars, including De Sainte Marie, Frère Michel, Father Caillon…etc….
  12. Is the Secret Apocalyptic ? The 3rd Secret is related to the end of the Times from the Book of the Revelation of St John, called also the Novissimi.
  13. To be Continued.


On this French Election Day, Make it known to my Ministers….etc….video from Father Gruner. Vive la France, Fille Ainée de l’Eglise !



08 May 2017

PART 4 Fatima

Few more questions about Fatima and my answers :

13. Is there a deadline to Consecrate Russia ? Yes and the deadline is related to the Vision of the 3rd Secret

14. What is the Vision of the Secret ? The Vision represents an Apocalyptic Picture of Rome, A Bishop dressed in White and the Holy Father killed by soldiers

15. Is this Vision related to the Secret ?  Yes the 3rd Secret explains that Vision as the Bishop dressed in White and Why the Pope is Killed

16. About the Deadline, 2017 or 2029 ? probably 2017

17. Are the Bishop dressed in white and the Holy Father, 2 different Persons ? Yes

18. Is the Vision a literal or a concrete view of the Future ? The vision is a concret future event of the Church, Nothing literal within Fatima, from the 1st to the last Secret

19. When The Consecration of Russia will be done ? During or after the War

20. What about the 3rd Secret ? The Secret will be lived then revealed

21. Did the Secret talks about a Pope Under the Control of Satan ? Yes, the last one before the Consecration

22. Is Fatima a Public or a Private Revelation ? Fatima is the Future of the Church so of the World, de facto Fatima concerns all of us and cannot be considered as a private Revelation

23. Is Pope Benedict Resignation related to the Fatima 3rd Secret ? Yes probably

24. Is Garabandal a continuation of Fatima ? Yes and this explains why Garabandal is not approved by the Church

25. Is Akita a continuation of Fatima ? No Akita is a continuation of Garabandal only as Fatima is a continuation of La Salette, Akita talks about the Sign left by my Son, this is the Permanent Sign prophesied in Garabandal by our Lady of the Mount Carmel

26. Is the Garabandal Prophecy of Popes related to the 3rd Secret ? Yes and probably the main reason why Garabandal was not approved by the Church.

27. Can the Consecration of Russia be done before a new World War ? Yes but unlikely, in any case we must Pray for that

28. To be continued.


3rd Secret Chronology from John Salza, perfect from a Fatima Scholars, to Watch in full and without hesitation, enjoy !


13 May 2017

PART 5  The Bishop Dressed in white

Francis Says That He Is the
“Bishop Dressed in White”

by Christopher A. Ferrara
May 12, 2017

Tomorrow, at Fatima, Pope Francis will canonize Jacinta and Francisco, further enshrining the Fatima event in the life of the Church by raising two of three Fatima seers to the altars. In yet another twist to the labyrinthine mystery of the Third Secret, however, the prayer he will recite at the Fatima shrine contains this astonishing declaration:

“Hail Mother of Mercy, Lady of the white robe! At this place where one hundred years ago you showed all the designs of our God’s mercy, I look upon your robe of light and, as bishop dressed in white [como bispo vestido de branco], I remember all those who, robed in baptismal white, want to live in God and pray the mysteries of Christ to attain peace.”

Pope Bergoglio’s self-description as a “bishop dressed in white” clearly evokes the vision pertaining to the Third Secret, published on June 26, 2000, whose textual description, recorded by Sister Lucia, includes the following: “And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’.”

This is surely no coincidence, but rather an intended allusion. For Pope Bergoglio’s reference to white baptismal robes is not particularly relevant to the occasion tomorrow. Rather, it seems designed to set up a reference to himself as a bishop dressed in white.

This raises a curious point concerning what Sister Lucia recorded. Why did she write concerning the mysterious “Bishop dressed in White” that “we had the impression that it was the Holy Father”? Why only an “impression”? Did not Our Lady inform the seers exactly who the white-clad bishop was? After all, She was perfectly clear about every other detail of the Message of Fatima, including the very name of the Pope (Pius XI) who would be reigning when World War II began. Why would Our Lady identify by name the Pope who would reign at the outset of World War II, but fail to identify the white-clad bishop executed by a band of soldiers outside the devastated city, leaving the seers with only an “impression” that it is the Holy Father?

Or is it the Holy Father? Are the white-clad bishop and the Holy Father one and the same person or are they two different people? Bear in mind that, for the first time in Church history, there are indeed two “bishops dressed in white” living in the Vatican enclave, both of whom are known by papal names, one of whom refers to himself, and is referred to by Pope Bergoglio, as “Pope Emeritus.”

What are we to make of the fact that Pope Bergoglio has apparently placed himself into the post-apocalyptic scenario depicted in the vision, there being no other plausible explanation for why, at Fatima of all places, he would describe himself with the exact phrase employed in the Third Secret vision? Moreover, if Pope Bergoglio sees himself as the “Bishop dressed in White,” has he not in his own way joined Pope Benedict in discarding Cardinal Sodano’s ridiculous “interpretation” that the white-clad bishop being executed by soldiers is John Paul II not being executed by a lone assassin? Does he have reason to believe that he is the white-clad bishop who meets with death on one of the hills outside a devastated city of Rome?

Yet again we see why there simply must be a text in which the Virgin Herself explains the meaning and significance of each detail of the enigmatic vision, just as She did with the rest of the Message of Fatima. Among other things, She would of course have clarified the “impression” that the bishop executed in the vision is the Pope.

As things now stand, the “Third Secret” the Vatican has presented to the world — the vision standing alone — has produced nothing but dueling interpretations rather than the certain guidance the Mother of God surely wanted to provide the Church and the world. No, something is missing. And sooner or later it will be revealed.


My Comment : He said it himself, “he is the Bishop dressed in White”, thanks to the Holy Spirit, I felt (Thanks to our Lady) Something related to the Centenary of Fatima will happen, between us I was hoping some sign from Heaven or some event which could confirm my work or not and this news is even more than I was expected, my friends we are living an incredible time, you cannot imagine, working on this text of 25 lines (the 3rd Secret) for years, I measure myself how important this announcement is, which is an additional mockery to be clear from those behind the walls who decided to bury our Lady of Fatima for ever and have infiltrated Rome to the Top, to me this news is also a key event in the timetable of the Fatima 3rd Secret, Pride will lose them and the Promised Triumph will be ours, please be sure of that.


Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us !

23 May 2017

PART 6 Cardinal Burke

Cardinal Burke’s Historic Address on the
Consecration of Russia and the Third Secret

by Christopher A. Ferrara
May 22, 2017

In my column of April 24, I expressed the view that “the laity must take the lead in speaking the truth about our situation” in the midst of this endlessly turbulent pontificate because “it is certain there is no help on the way from the Princes of the Church.”

I am very happy to abandon that opinion where Cardinal Raymond Burke is concerned. I have already reported here that at the just-concluded Rome Life Forum, which met to address the growing Bergoglian crisis post-Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Burke called for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary with these words:

“Certainly, Pope Saint John Paul II consecrated the world, including Russia, to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on March 25, 1984. But, today, once again, we hear the call of Our Lady of Fatima to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, in accord with her explicit instruction.”

Publication of the full text of his address by LifeSiteNews, however, reveals that the Cardinal was not suggesting that the 1984 ceremony effected Russia’s consecration, which should merely be done again, but rather that the consecration Our Lady requested was not done in the first place. Quoth the Cardinal:

“In fact, the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary did not take place, as she requested, and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays did not become the practice of the universal Church.”

For decades, Father Nicholas Gruner was mocked and marginalized for insisting upon this obvious truth. But now a Prince of the Church has declared it to the world without equivocation. May God bless him for it.

But there is something just as important in this historic address. While being prudent about his manner of expression, Cardinal Burke implicitly confirms that the Vatican has not disclosed the entirety of the Third Secret. The relevant passages merit quotation at length (bolding and paragraph breaks added for readability):

“The third part of the Secret, indicated by the “etc.” at the end of the second part, has to deal with the spiritual chastisement brought about by the rebellion of man who instead of giving his heart to the Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary gives over his heart to the corruption of the worldly materialism and relativism of the age…

“Without entering into a discussion regarding whether the third part of the Secret has been fully revealed, it seems clear from the most respected studies of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, that it has to do with the diabolical forces unleashed upon the world in our time and entering into the very life of the Church which lead souls away from the truth of the faith and, therefore, from the Divine Love flowing from the glorious pierced Heart of Jesus. Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité, in his monumental study of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, writes the following regarding the third part of the Secret or what is often called the Third Secret:

“‘In short, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary undoubtedly refers much more to the third Secret than even the second. For the recovery of peace will be a gift from Heaven, but it is not, properly speaking, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Her victory is of another order, supernatural, and then temporal by addition. It will first be the victory of the Faith, which will put an end to the time of apostasy, and the great shortcomings of the Church’s pastors.’

“As horrible as are the physical chastisements associated with man’s disobedient rebellion before God, infinitely more horrible are the spiritual chastisements for they have to do with the fruit of grievous sin: eternal death….

“The teaching of the Faith in its integrity and with courage is the heart of the office of the Church’s pastors: the Roman Pontiff, the Bishops in communion with the See of Peter, and their principal co-workers, the priests. For that reason, the Third Secret is directed, with particular force, to those who exercise the pastoral office in the Church.

“Their failure to teach the faith, in fidelity to the Church’s constant teaching and practice, whether through a superficial, confused or even worldly approach, and their silence endangers mortally, in the deepest spiritual sense, the very souls for whom they have been consecrated to care spiritually.

“The poisonous fruits of the failure of the Church’s pastors is seen in a manner of worship, of teaching and of moral discipline which is not in accord with Divine Law.”

As we can see, Cardinal Burke — undoubtedly with the Bergoglian tumult in view — has essentially adopted the position of the long-derided “Fatimites,” especially Father Gruner, even citing Father Gruner’s internationally promoted primary source: Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité’s “monumental study of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima.” In particular, the Cardinal affirms:

    • that the Third Secret begins with Our Lady’s reference to Portugal, ending with Lucia’s famous “etc.” indicating further words of the Virgin;
    • that the Secret predicts a terrible crisis of faith and discipline — a veritable apostasy — involving “the failure of the Church’s pastors” from the Pope on down to “teach the faith, in fidelity to the Church’s constant teaching and practice” — a clear reference to Amoris Laetitia, among many other disastrous hierarchical departures from Tradition over the past fifty years;
  • that the resulting spiritual chastisement is “infinitely more horrible” than the material chastisement seen in the vision published in 2000.

Now, none of what the Cardinal affirms pertaining to the contents of the Secret is seen in the vision of the “Bishop dressed in White” standing alone, where one sees only an attack on the Church from enemies without in the midst of a post-apocalyptic scenario involving a material chastisement. Rather, these elements, as he himself declares, must be found in the words of the Virgin for which Sister Lucia held the place with that telltale “etc.” — those three little letters that have bedeviled the Vatican apparatus since 2000, which it pointedly refuses to address. It is precisely those precious words that the Vatican has withheld from us.

The Cardinal’s courageous declarations are all the more remarkable in that they represent a substantial reversal of his previous position on the Fatima event. (There is no need to dredge up those details now.) This change of mind and heart is a testimony to the Cardinal’s intellectual honesty and his love for the Church and, above all, for souls.

Every Catholic should pray for the well being of Cardinal Raymond Burke and for the emergence of many other cardinals who will emulate his profile in courage. For humanly speaking (absent a direct divine intervention of the most drastic sort), it is first and foremost the Princes of the Church who must defend her against the unparalleled attack from within that she now endures — an attack that stands at the heart of the Third Secret of Fatima.

ADDENDUM: I cannot fail to mention the important contribution of Cardinal Caffarra at the same conference. In his address he declared: “We are no longer witnesses, but deserters, if we do not speak openly and publicly… I have spoken frequently of a confrontation… assuming the appearance of a trial, of a legal proceeding, in which the defendant is Jesus and his Gospel. As in every legal proceeding, there are also witnesses in favour: in favour of Jesus and his Gospel. Announcement of the Gospel of Marriage and of Life today takes place in a context of hostility, of challenge, of unbelief.”


My Comment :

10 More questions about Fatima and my personnal researchs

29. Does the Secret speak of an Anti-Pope ? probably or unfortunately, my researchs are very clear with this sensitive topic, our Lady probably warns the Church so the World of this risk, in other words the great Apostasy will begin at the Top

30. What does it mean ? The Great Apostasy could not have begun without the negligence or disobedience of some Popes de facto one of them should be also that Pope in question

31. Did the Secret was intented only for the Pope ? Yes and No, The secret is a strong Warning and concerns first of all the Catholic Church (in the sense of extra ecclasiam nulla salus) so de facto the World, the Catholic Church being the only possible door to Heaven and Salvation

32. Is this Anti-Pope topic the main reason of the non-disclosure of the Secret ? Yes probably and especially from the Year 1960

33. Why 1960 ? This year was the deadline to reveal the 3rd Secret

34. Did Rome lie in 2000 ? They revealed the 3rd Secret Vision only but not the text explaining that Vision, the so Called 3rd Secret of 25 Lines, de facto they lied, simple as that

35. Why ? Probably because of the content of the text explaining that Vision, in other words, they doubted the veracity of the Text because a part concerns the Magisterium and especially the Papacy

36. Is the Bishop in White an Anti-Pope or a false Pope ? Yes Probably

37.  Which Pope will Consecrate Russia ? We don’t know which Pope but First of all a valid Pope, in my opinion but this is my opinion only, Pope Benedict or the successor of Pope Francis, in any case we are probably very close to a Consecration as we can read via Cardinal Burke, a Great Prince of the Church and May God Bless him, mentalities change before the facts, in other words the Triumph is on the way and the time to be silent is probably over

38. Will the Consecration be done in Rome ? I don’t think so, to me in Fatima, some told me in Moscow, we can’t be sure and time will tell only.


Pray for me Father !


10 June 2017

PART 7 Of Fatima and Souls

Written by  Michael McBride

The Human Soul

Each human person was in the Mind of God from all eternity, body and soul.  Each would come into actual existence at the moment of conception, when this unique soul would be infused into its unique body.  Incredibly, beyond our comprehension, each of us was specifically willed by God from all eternity.  And, since the motive for everything which God does is love, He loves that which He creates.  God loves each person that exists.  He desires that this person share His life for all eternity in Heaven.

Pause & ponder, for a moment:  God desires that you personably (and every other human being) share His life forever in unimaginable happiness.

This will be possible because, once in existence, the human soul and body will live forever.  It is true that, at death, the soul and body will be separated.  But, as our Catholic faith teaches us, they will be re-united at the resurrection of the body on the last day.  (The only exceptions to this, of course, are the Bodies of Jesus and His Mother, both of Whom possess Their Bodies now in Heaven.)  At the resurrection, one soul will animate a glorified body, while another may well inhabit a hideous specimen for all eternity.  Each person will have freely determined, during their life on earth, just which of the two bodies will be theirs.The Great Secret of Fatima

Sacrifice yourselves for sinners….

“As Our Lady said these words,” Lucia later described the scenes, “She opened Her hands again as She had done the two previous months.  The light reflecting from them seemed to penetrate into the earth, and we saw as if into a sea of fire, and immersed in that fire were devils and souls with human form, as if they were transparent black or bronze embers floating in the fire and swayed by the flames that issued from them along with clouds of smoke, falling upon every side just like the falling of sparks in great fires, without weight or equilibrium, amidst wailing and cries of pain and despair that horrified and shook us with terror.  We could tell the devils by their horrible and nauseous figures of baleful and unknown animals, but transparent as the black coals in a fire.”

“Frightened, deathly pale, the [three little seers] raised their eyes to Our Lady for help as Lucia cried out.  ‘Oh…Our Lady!’

“Our Lady explained: ‘You have seen Hell – where the souls of poor sinners go.  To save them God wants to establish throughout the world the devotion to My Immaculate Heart. If people will do what I tell you, many souls will be saved, and there will be peace.’[1]

God sent His Mother to Fatima in 1917 to save souls, to prevent these greatly-loved beings from spending eternity in Hell.  She came to plead with us to stop offending God “… for He is already too much offended.”  And she came to warn us that the direction that many were taking in their lives would inevitably lead to more wars, persecutions, destruction, suffering, death, and the eternal loss of many souls, unless we changed course.  The choice was ours to make and we were urged to pray and make sacrifices for sinners.

Foreseeing what would happen if humanity continued on the same path, Our Lady gave the children signs to look for and messages to deliver to those in authority in the Church.  This task would not affect the two younger seers so much, for as to Lucia’s question to Our Lady at the 2nd apparition, “I would like to ask You also to take us to Heaven!” the Holy Mother answered, “Yes… I will take Jacinta and Francisco soon.  You, however, are to stay here a longer time.  Jesus wants to use you to make Me known and loved.  He wants to establish the Devotion to My Immaculate Heart in the world.  I promise salvation to those who embrace it and their souls will be loved by God as flowers placed by Myself to adorn His throne.”[2]  Within three years, Francisco and Jacinta had been taken by Our Lady to Heaven and Lucia would have to carry on without their visible presence.  To console her, the Blessed Mother promised that “I will never leave you.  My Immaculate Heart will be your refuge and the way that will lead you to God.”[3]

This Devotion of which Our Lady spoke was to be effected primarily in two ways: the promulgation of the First Five Saturdays and the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  The first of these was outlined by the Blessed Mother when she visited Sister Lucia in her convent at Pontevedra on December 10, 1925.  “You [Sister Lucia], at least, try to console Me, and announce in My name that I promise to assist at the hour of death, with all graces necessary for salvation, all those who, on the first Saturdays of five consecutive months, confess, receive Holy Communion, recite the Rosary and keep Me company for fifteen minutes meditating on the fifteen mysteries of the Rosary with the intention of making reparation to Me.”[4]  Reparation for what?  As Our Lord explained to Sister Lucia on the night of May 29-30, 1930: “My daughter, the reason (for the Five First Saturdays) is simple.  There are five types of offenses and blasphemies committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary:

  1. Blasphemies against the Immaculate Conception.
  2. Blasphemies against Her perpetual virginity.
  3. Blasphemies against Her Divine Maternity, in refusing at the same time to

     recognize Her as the Mother of men.

  1. The blasphemies of those who publicly seek to sow in the hearts of

     children indifference or scorn, or even hatred of the Immaculate Mother.

  1. The offenses of those who outrage Her directly in Her holy images.

“Here, My daughter, is the reason why the Immaculate Heart of Mary inspired Me to ask for this little act of reparation…and in consideration of it, to move My mercy to pardon souls who have had the misfortune of offending Her.  As for you, always seek by your prayers and sacrifices to move My mercy to pity for these poor souls.”[5]

The Promised Blessing:  assistance “at the hour of death, with all graces necessary for salvation….”

As for the Consecration of Russia, Our Lady appeared to Sister Lucia on June 13, 1929 in her convent at Tuy, Spain indicating just how the fulfillment of Her order for the Consecration was to be carried out.  The Pope was to order ALL the bishops of the Catholic Church to join him in consecrating specifically Russia to Her Immaculate Heart.  This act was to be carried out by both the Pope and the bishops on the same day, at the same time.  Should a bishop be in Rome at the time, he was to join the Pope there; if not, he was to carry out the Consecration in a well-publicized ceremony in his own diocese.  The only ones exempted from this would be those bishops who were ill or otherwise prevented from doing so by adverse or hostile forces.

The Promised Blessing:  the conversion of Russia to the Roman Catholic Church and a period of peace to be granted to the world.

So many graces and blessings bestowed upon us and the world for so little effort on our part!  Who, in their right mind, would turn down such offers?  And, yet, many of us in the Church and among the hierarchy did just that.  We – both laity and hierarchy – failed to carry out Our Lady’s (and Her Son’s) expressed desires and commands.

To make it clear just how displeased He was that the Consecration did not take place after the passage of only two years, Our Lord appeared to Sister Lucia at Rianjo, Spain in August 1931 and said to her:

“Make it known to My ministers, given that they follow the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of My command [to consecrate Russia], they will follow him into misfortune.  It will never be too late to have recourse to Jesus and Mary.”[6]

When the Consecration was further delayed, Sister Lucia wrote to her confessor, Fr. José Goncalves, S.J., on May 18, 1936 and informed him that she had asked Our Lord why He would not convert Russia without the Consecration.  Our Lord responded:

“Because I want My whole Church to acknowledge that consecration as a triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, so that it may extend its cult later on, and place devotion to this Immaculate Heart beside the devotion to My Sacred Heart.”

He went on to say:

“The Holy Father.  Pray very much for the Holy Father.  He will do it, but it will be late.  Nevertheless, the Immaculate Heart of Mary will save Russia.  It has been entrusted to her.”[7]

In 1927, Sister Lucia had received permission from Heaven to disclose the first two parts of the Secret revealed to the children on July 13, 1917: the vision of Hell and the “urgent need for devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary”.  She relayed this information to her confessors, her Mother Provincial, and the Bishop of Leiria.  By 1931, Pope Pius XI knew of Our Lady’s requests and by June 9, 1944 Sister Lucia had written down the first two parts of the Secret in her notebooks, ending with the words “In Portugal the doctrine of the faith will always be kept”, etc.  The words of Our Lady explaining the meaning of the third part of the Secret followed the “etc.” and were written on a separate sheet of paper enclosed in an envelope with Sister Lucia’s writing on the outside.  These documents were both sent to the Bishop of Leiria for safe keeping.  He was to reveal the third part of the Secret to the world should Sister Lucia die before the year 1960, the year Our Lady wanted it disclosed to the Church and the world.  They remained with him until 1957, when he was ordered to send them to the Vatican.  He never read the so-called third secret, we are told, as he didn’t want the responsibility of being privy to that knowledge.  Sent to Rome, the notebooks were stored in the Vatican Archives, the one page letter in the sealed envelope was kept in the papal apartment.

In a 1955 visit from Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, the Prefect of the Holy Office (since re-named the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith), to his questions, Sister Lucia answered that the year 1960 was chosen by Our Lady and the reason why that particular year was designated was that “it [the secret’s meaning] would be clearer then”.

To date, the Consecration, as called for by Our Lady, has not been carried out.  Hence, the promised blessings have not taken place.

What if …?

What if the Consecration had taken place shortly after Our Lady stipulated, on June 13, 1929, how it was to be carried out?  Russia would certainly have been converted to the Catholic Church and an era of peace would have been granted the world.  How long an era of peace?  At least long enough to be significant and noticeable.  That would, perhaps, have meant no Spanish Civil War, no Second World War, and (speaking for Americans alone) no Korean War, no Vietnam, no Bosnia, no Gulf War, no Afghanistan, no Iraq, no war in Syria, not to mention the many other regional wars which have since taken place in other parts of the world nor the countless terrorist attacks inflicted by various hate-filled groups.  How many souls were lost (and continue to be lost) as a result of these conflicts and the long delay?  Thousands?  Millions?  Uncountable millions?  And remember – each one of these souls was purposely created by God to exist and to experience the divine life with Him for all eternity.  Now?  Now, they are lost for all eternity.  No second chances, no “do-overs”, no reprieves, damned as the souls the children saw in the vision of Hell shown them on July 13, 1917.  What pain and suffering this must continue to cause Our Lord and His Holy Mother!  And the suffering endured by Sister Lucia as a result of the delay!  That these greatly-loved souls have been lost forever!  Need we wonder how it was that Jesus sweated blood in the Garden as He looked down the centuries and saw all those loved ones who would not benefit from the sacrifice He was soon to undergo on the Cross?

Why was the Consecration not carried out as Our Lady stipulated?  Who was to benefit by delaying it when there was so much to gain?  Were there those within the Church herself, perhaps even powerful prelates, who were deliberately thwarting Our Lady’s and Her Son’s commands?  For what purpose?  What could possibly be the reason?  What was worth the eternal loss of so many souls?  Or of even one soul?

The Third Part of the Great Secret

In a previous article in the Remnant (double issue of 5/15 & 31/17), I asked two questions related to the disclosure of the so-called Third Secret at the Vatican press conference held on June 26, 2000.  They were:

Why could she (Sister Lucia) – who was the only one alive who actually knew what the vision portrayed – not have read the Third Secret aloud at the conference and explained its meaning?

Why was it necessary for the Vatican to interpret what the vision meant?

The answers to these questions are quite simple and obvious.  Sister Lucia wasn’t the only one who knew what the vision portrayed and its meaning.  At least four Popes knew – Pope John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, and John Paul II – because they had read both the notebooks of Sister Lucia kept in the Vatican Archives and her one page letter containing the words of Our Lady kept in the papal apartment.  In addition to these, various other high ranking Vatican prelates, their associates, and selected others knew what Our Lady had revealed to the children concerning the vision’s meaning.  And, it’s precisely because others knew the meaning that Sister Lucia was silenced (under her vow of Obedience) in 1960 from speaking about the Third Secret.  These others couldn’t allow her to speak because she would have revealed Our Lady’s interpretation, something which they didn’t want either the Church or the world to know.  And so, they had to explain the vision in such a way as to keep the true interpretation hidden.  Why did the truth have to remain hidden?  What was the truth?

When the Great Secret was given to Lucia, Francisco, and Jacinta on July 13, 1917, it was given in the context of pleas and warnings.  Our Lady could see what was coming if mankind didn’t reform itself and convert to the Lord.  One of those warnings was the third part of this Great Secret.  Knowing that mankind would not change its ways in time, She alerted us to something that was coming and would become “more clear” by the year 1960.  This third part of the Secret, then, was for us – both those in the Church and the world in general.  Though some of it concerned the Pope, it was not exclusively for the Pope.  It was for all of us Catholics.  It was a warning so that we would have some time to take steps to confront and combat a coming threat.  Our Lady wanted us to be prepared; both the Church and the world awaited the revelation.  But, having read the words of Our Lady, Pope John XXIII decided to suppress them and not make them known.  He made a decision it was not his to make.  Shortly thereafter, on February 8, 1960, an anonymous Vatican press release informed us that the Third Secret would probably never be opened (meaning released to the Church and the world).[8]

Why was the Third Secret – the vision and Our Lady’s words explaining the meaning of the vision – being hidden from us?  How, then, could we defend ourselves from the coming threat?  What was being hidden from our knowledge?  Did the Third Secret speak of the upcoming Vatican Council, to “dangers threatening the faith and the life of the Christian and therefore [the life] of the world” (Cardinal Ratzinger), to “apostasy [loss of faith] within the Church” (Cardinal Oddi), to something “scary” (Mother Angelica), to the idea “…that many Cardinals, bishops, and priests are on the road to hell and taking many more souls with them” (Fr. Nicolas Gruner, quoting Fr. Malachi Martin), to the thought “that the great apostasy [within] the Church will begin at the top” (Cardinal Mario Ciappi), to a great catastrophe (Pope John Paul II at Fulda Cathedral in 1982), to the notion “that Russia would wage a sudden war, would overrun all of Europe” (Sister Elena Aiello), to the thought that “it is therefore completely probable that the text makes concrete reference to the crisis of faith within the Church and to the negligence of the pastors themselves [and the] internal struggles in the very bosom of the Church and of grave pastoral negligence of the upper hierarchy” (Fr. Alonso – official Fatima archivist), to the revelation that “we must be prepared to undergo great trials in the not too distant future” (Ian Colquhoun in The Fatima Crusader, issue #94, p. 47), to the truth that “the greatest persecution of the Church does not come from external enemies, but is born of sin in the Church, from the sin that exists in the Church…” (Pope Benedict XVI), to the thought that “Our Lady’s Secret warns explicitly against the disastrous effects … of alterations to the rite of Holy Mass.” (Fatima Center staff in The Fatima Crusader, issue #110, p. 28.)

If the thus far hidden words of Our Lady relate to any or all of the above it is understandable why the Vatican would suppress Her words.  But at what cost?  Sure, the above is troubling, painful, certainly embarrassing and shameful, frightening, despicable, deceitful, and any number of other descriptive words.  But suppressed at what cost?  The cost of souls!  How many souls?  Only God knows.  Is the continued secrecy worth the loss of even one more soul?  Are not you (in the Church) who have deceived us for so long not concerned about your own souls?  Or have you ceased to believe entirely?

And as if to make matters even worse, when the Vatican finally revealed part of the Third Secret on June 26, 2000, their eventual interpretation was insulting, especially to those more familiar with the Fatima events and their aftermath.  To identify the death of the Pope in the vision to the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II in 1981 was ludicrous.  How could an event in 1981 be more clear (mais claro, in Sister Lucia’s words) in 1960?

“Therefore, take unto you the armour of God…”

There is a chastisement coming, in addition to the punishments which God has already permitted to fall on the world since 1931.  It had been prophesied by both Our Lord in 1931 to Sister Lucia when voicing His displeasure over the long delay in Consecrating Russia, and on October 13, 1973 when Our Lady told Sister Agnes Sasagawa in Akita, Japan: “As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity.”[9]

It is well for us to remember that we are at war with Satan, that

“… our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirit of wickedness in the high places.  Therefore, take unto you the armour of God, that you may be able to resist in the evil day, and to stand in all things perfect.  Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth and having on the breastplate of justice and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace: in all things taking the shield of faith, wherewith you may be able to extinguish all the fiery darts of the most wicked one.”  (Ephesians 6:12-16)

In this battle, the stakes are high – human souls.  Help is there for the asking and Heaven will provide us with that help.  But, we must make use of it; we must do our part.

On May 19, 2017, LifeSite News reported that Raymond Cardinal Burke, in an appeal he made at the Roman Life Forum, called upon the Catholic faithful to “work for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.”  In his talk, he went on to say that:

“In fact, the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary did not take place as [S]he requested and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays did not become the practice of the universal Church.

“Amongst the many terrible consequences of the failure of Catholics to adopt the practice of the First Saturdays, and of the popes to consecrate Russia as Our Lady requested, is the spiritual crisis that is shaking the Church to her foundations and the onslaught against the family, especially the mass killing of unborn children and the systematic corruption of children….

“As horrible as are the physical chastisements associated with man’s disobedient rebellion before God, infinitely more horrible are the spiritual chastisements for they have to do with the fruit of grievous sin: eternal death.  As is clear, only the Faith, which places man in the relationship of unity of heart with the Sacred Heart of Jesus, through the mediation of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, can save man from the spiritual chastisements which rebellion against God necessarily brings upon its perpetrators and upon the whole of both society and the Church.

“The teaching of the Faith in its integrity and with courage is the heart of the office of the Church’s pastors: the Roman Pontiff, the Bishops in communion with the See of Peter, and their principal co-workers, the priests.  For that reason, the Third Secret is directed, with particular force, to those who exercise the pastoral office in the Church.  Their failure to teach the faith, in fidelity to the Church’s constant teaching and practice, whether through a superficial, confused or even worldly approach, and their silence endangers mortally, in the deepest spiritual sense, the very souls for whom they have been consecrated to care spiritually.  The poisonous fruits of the failure of the Church’s pastors is seen in a manner of worship, of teaching and of moral discipline which is not in accord with Divine Law.”[10] (Emphasis added)

We (the faithful hierarchy and laity) must, therefore, do as Our Lord and Our Lady commanded of us.  It is necessary to:

  • amend our lives and stop offending God,
  • pray the Rosary daily.  As Sister Lucia said:

“The decadence of the world is without doubt the result of a lack of a spirit of prayer.  It was in anticipation of the disorientation that the Blessed Virgin Mary insisted so strongly on praying the [R]osary.  This is because the prayer of the [R]osary is, after the Holy Mass, the most apt at conserving and increasing the faith in souls, that the devil has unleashed this war against it.”[11]

  • pray especially for the conversion of sinners,
  • make sacrifices of reparation for sinners (self included), for many go to Hell because they have no one to pray and make sacrifices for them,
  • consecrate Russia, specifically, to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, such consecration to be carried out by the Pope and all the Catholic bishops of the world, on the same day, at the same time,
  • take up the Devotion of the Five First Saturdays, even on a continuing basis,
  • wear the Brown Scapular of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel,
  • hold onto the perennial teachings and traditions of the Church,
  • release Our Lady’s words explaining the vision shown to the children, regardless of the confusion or shame that may result.  Immortal souls are at stake.

“… in the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph.  The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be given to the world.”[12]

May that day soon dawn, Holy Mother!


“Truly, it is the greatest of errors to neglect the business of eternal salvation.”

  • St. Eucherius

“It [the neglect of the soul] is an error that exceeds all others, for to lose the soul is a mistake without remedy.”

  • St. Alphonsus de Liguori

Dear Lady of Fatima, pray for us!
St. Jacinta, pray for us!
St. Francisco, pray for us!
Sister Lucia, pray for us!



My Comment : What a Great Article ! Everything is there, from the irresponsability of the Church and the lost of millions of Souls, this is exactly what I got from my own conclusion during my personnal research about the Fatima 3rd Secret, within few words, We were betrayed by our hierarchy, it tooks me more than a year to recover the peace of Soul without losing my Faith after this conclusion but let read again this irresponsability within what is to me the most important part of this article :

What if …?

What if the Consecration had taken place shortly after Our Lady stipulated, on June 13, 1929, how it was to be carried out?  Russia would certainly have been converted to the Catholic Church and an era of peace would have been granted the world.  How long an era of peace?  At least long enough to be significant and noticeable.  That would, perhaps, have meant no Spanish Civil War, no Second World War, and (speaking for Americans alone) no Korean War, no Vietnam, no Bosnia, no Gulf War, no Afghanistan, no Iraq, no war in Syria, not to mention the many other regional wars which have since taken place in other parts of the world nor the countless terrorist attacks inflicted by various hate-filled groups.  How many souls were lost (and continue to be lost) as a result of these conflicts and the long delay?  Thousands?  Millions?  Uncountable millions?  And remember – each one of these souls was purposely created by God to exist and to experience the divine life with Him for all eternity.  Now?  Now, they are lost for all eternity.  No second chances, no “do-overs”, no reprieves, damned as the souls the children saw in the vision of Hell shown them on July 13, 1917.  What pain and suffering this must continue to cause Our Lord and His Holy Mother!  And the suffering endured by Sister Lucia as a result of the delay!  That these greatly-loved souls have been lost forever!  Need we wonder how it was that Jesus sweated blood in the Garden as He looked down the centuries and saw all those loved ones who would not benefit from the sacrifice He was soon to undergo on the Cross?

How many souls were lost (and continue to be lost) as a result of these conflicts and the long delay?  Thousands?  Millions?  Uncountable millions?  And remember – each one of these souls was purposely created by God to exist and to experience the divine life with Him for all eternity.”

I learned from the Great Work of Frère Michel, probably one of the Greatest Expert of Fatima with Father Alonso, to me probably the Greatest, I learned from him and my own research, the indeniable irresponsability of each Pope since 1929 to date, including even the Great Pope Pius XII unfortunately, not counting in these wars, the millions of souls lost with abortion, I am telling you, I could not sleep in peace for a long time, and without my Rosary, probably the help of our Lady and Prayers of my readers, I will have lost faith, by the way and for your information, I found back Frère Michel few years ago, still alive but CLOISTERED in a Monastery, so today I am not the same anymore and often on my knees, I am still beating my breast.





52 thoughts on “En route for the Garabandal Warning ? Part 7 Fatima and Souls

  1. In this video, there is mention of Međugorje briefly but don’t let that put you off listening.

    Fr Dan mentions an Irish Priest told him that the Bishop and Priests of the Diocese in which Garabandal is situated, already have a hand book put together on how to go forward once the Warning happens, they already have protocols in place for after the Warning, that is, how to deal with the influx of people seeking Confession and others seeking reception in to the Catholic Church. They discuss also the fact that events will occur following a Synod.

    I wonder has anyone here read Christine Watkins’ book, The Warning: Testimonies and Prophecies of the Illumination of Conscience?

    Fr. Dan Reehil, exorcist and Director of Radio Maria, interviews Christine Watkins about the coming Illumination of Conscience. Mrs. Watkins explains the event, and they discuss how we should prepare, should it happen in our lifetime. They give a message of hope – a calling, a plea for prayer and for true repentance of heart. Never put off what you can do today. Convert now for you know neither the day nor the hour when we will come face to face with God.

    God bless

    • Very funny, Pete.
      I wanted to post the same video on this Blog a few days ago. I refrained because of the short reference to Medjugorje, in order not to hurt the sensibility of some readers.
      It is now evident to me that Our Lady wanted this info out herein and inspired you as well.
      God bless. Let’s pray.

  2. Let us pray much for the Holy Father as Our Lady of Fatima (and the Holy Father himself has asked for) has asked for. The power of human prayer united with Our Lady’s is so powerful.

  3. Hello Aviso,

    In my opinion it`s not the will of God and also the Blessed Mother tought us in her messages that we should`nt speculate with tve date of the Great Miracle. I know that this is not easy, because for an human beeing it is normal reaction because the world and everybody of us need this Miracle. In my opinion the danger of the prediction, that the Great Miracle will hapen for an example in 2018 or 2019, 2020 and so and then it will not happen in this timetable, so the consequence will be that people don`t believe it and don`t try to live the message of Garabandal. The canadian Garabandal Center offers us the follow statement:
    ‘Miracle Date

    Date of the Miracle in Garabandal
    Only Conchita knows the date of the Miracle in Garabandal. People have been speculating about the date for many years. There have been several times when thousands of pilgrims have come to Garabandal on a certain date, believing that the Miracle was on that day. But that is NOT what Our Lady wants from us. She specifically told Conchita to reveal the date only 8 days in advance. She did this for a reason. That is because it is more important to follow Her messages and live the lives Our Lord wants us to live: prayer, penance, frequent confession, daily Mass and Holy Communion, daily rosary, visiting the Blessed Sacrament, prayer for priests, wearing the scapular, etc. Whether the Warning and Miracle happen today or tomorrow should not be a concern. If Our Lord wants you to be in Garabandal for the Miracle, you will be there. In the meantime, it’s best to concentrate on doing what He wants us to do and trying to be what He wants us to be.

    • Hi Jochen, Please tell to the Canadian Garabandal Center to do their homework from me, I cannot count myself how many mistakes, wrong intrepretations and so on, I read there and for years, Pope John Paul II the last Pope then no More for example…etc…it’s not any speculation about Dates which have emptied the Pines but the incompetence of some as they told me in the village, so I don’t need anyone to remind me this kind of remark, I have enought friends there for that, I brought back Garabandal to his right place, as a continuation of Fatima and Not as a blessing of Vatican II, to understand Garabandal you must first know Fatima instead of watching to Medjugorje for example, The Great Miracle date is known to one seer according to her but the Warning Year was known to another seer as well, each of my readers are adults and responsibles, it is indicated online that my own dates are my opinion only and if they are probably wrong then I will not hesitate to work on a new and future dates, probably from November 01st of this year in that case, thank you.

      • Let me add if I know to correct a date (recently April 13, 2017) who was considered around the net a fait accompli for years, a kind of certainty even, for example all the hôtels in the area of Garabandal were booked for that date, I did not read anywhere and online anyone else within the so called Garabandalist community correcting this date, so who knows if I cannot have myself the necessary knowledge and experience to give to the faithfuls of the Lady of the Carmel, a date based at least on facts, a responsible date as I call it, from a Garabandalist and not from some amateurs.

    • Dear Jochen Gallob,

      I want to add some additional comments in support of Aviso’s comments.

      To begin with, yes only Conchita knows the date of the Miracle. You will need to direct me to the text that says that our Holy Madonna stated that we should not speculate on the date of the Miracle. Can you please provide this?

      Over the years Conchita has revealed clues about the date of the Miracle. It seems to me that our Holy Madonna gave Conchita permission to do this. For example:

      1) As a child Conchita played games with her priest asking him to guess the date of the Miracle. She derived lots of enjoyment over it because the priest could never guess the date of the Miracle.

      2) Then in interviews Conchita revealed that the Miracle will occur on a Thursday between the 8th and 16th in April, March, or May.

      3) The next clue that Conchita revealed is that the Miracle will not take place on Holy Thursday, Corpus Christi Thursday and the Ascension of Our Lord Thursday.

      With this information at our fingertips, Aviso was able to debunk the Miracle date found on the internet for Thursday, 13 April 2017, as it occurred on a Holy Thursday. This helped to tip off people who were going to Garabandal on this date, not to go because it was incorrect. Thus, it is a good thing to speculate on the Miracle in order to help the faithful in not being deceived.

      One final point, I think speculating on the date of the Miracle is a good thing because it keeps alive the messages of Our Lady of Garabandal and allows a community of believers to grow and give each other support.

      I hope this information helps.

      F & T in Christ

      • Dear Anonymous,

        Thank you for providing the web link to Conchita’s diary. I have now downloaded it to my computer. I consider it an invaluable resource.

        I have skimmed through Conchita’s diary to where she recounts that Fr. Luis Andreu is in ecstasy and he can see the Blessed Virgin Mary. He is also being shown the Miracle. Then comes the commentary, and yes in the commentary it states that apart from Conchita, her mother Aniceta, and two other persons in Rome know the date of the Miracle. I presume the commentary was written by the publisher and is accurate.

        I want to disclose that I read somewhere and I was aware that Conchita had confided in the Pope the date of the Miracle. Perhaps, the Pope could be one of the persons in Rome mentioned in the commentary of Conchita’s diary. If this is the case it could be Pope John XXIII (1958 – 1963) or Pope Paul VI (1963 – 1978). It would be a coincidence indeed if Pope John XXIII was the recipient of the date of the Miracle, as he too was the recipient of the Secrets of Fatima by Sister Lucia.

        Anyway, I discounted Pope John XXIII as I was thinking about the surviving people who know the date of the Miracle. That would be Conchita. All the rest are dead now.

        Thank you for your contribution. Conchita’s diary is 69 pages long. There is lots of stuff there that I will find useful.

        Perhaps Aviso would like to make some comments?

        F & T in Christ

      • I confirm Domenico, I know myself at least 2 Persons in Garabandal who could be aware of the good Garabandal Great Miracle date as of the Warning year (which is the most important) but unfortunately they did not gave to me any détails despite my insistence.

        Regarding Rome, I don’t think a second that any date related to Garabandal and since Pope Paul VI had ever been given to any Pope even less the current one.

  4. It is strange to me that you totally missed out on the meaning of “the Bishop dressed in white”. That is not Francis. That is Benedict. The children were unsure of who it was ( ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’). Impression, impression, impression. That is a word that tells you of their uncertainty. Benedict in his decrepit state (somewhere in the 2020’s) is martyred by soldiers along with the bishops, priests, men and women religious and various lay people. Now here is the secret. The killing is done on a world wide basis. The soldiers are the soldiers of the AntiChrist! Chapter 13 Verse 18 of the book of Revelation tells you that. Popes feed the sheep with spiritual food from heaven; they do not feed the sheep with doctrines of demons from hell.

    • Dear Dan,

      I think I will settle for Aviso’s interpretation. Some of your analysis is problematic. For example, if you delve into some Medieval history and the Renaissance period, you will see that there were some really bad Popes, quite evil Popes in fact.

      F & T in Christ

    • The consecration of Russia was not been made in 1984! Please read in the Marian Movement of
      Priests, #356, “This Marian Year” – June 10,1987, made to Fr. Stefano Gobbi !

  5. Aviso, I’m a huge believer in these apparitions, I just have one question..? What is your opinion on Korea and there advancing nuclear program and threats. Do you think they will play a role in bringing about WW3. They have had there first successful nuclear test and they are capable of reaching Hawaii and Alaska. Thoughts??

    • Hi Daniel, yes North Korea will probably play a role for the futur war using its nuclear weapon by targeting South Korea and Japon but not before any green light from China to whom Kim is the puppet.

      There is also and currently, another danger to follow closely, it is any possible impeachment of Trump, hopeffuly they will not sucess but if it’s the case and geopolitically speaking, this would be terrible especially with Russia, in other words as long as Russia is not consecrated as requested in Fatima, the risk of annihilation of nations is to be feared, personally I fear the worst as I cannot imagine Francis consecrating Russia, on the contrary, his pontificate has every chance of bringing us the wrath of God especially having in mind the Fatima 3rd Secret Vision , in any case we must Pray.

      • Dear Aviso,

        You raise a good point with possible impeachment of Trump and how this can change relations with Putin’s Russia. It is a dilemma. On the one hand we have the current peace (although problematic and very imperfect) of the two nuclear superpowers based on human initiative. On the other hand we are waiting for the peace promised to us by Our Lady of Fatima based on God’s initiative. Which do we choose? I don’t think we can have both.

        Russia under the Putin Leadership will not cause trouble only if it is allowed to do what it has started in 2008 with the “mini” invasion of Georgia (over South Ossetia and Abkhazia), and in 2014 with the invasion and partition of the Ukraine (loss of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine), I think there is more to come…

        America under the Trump Administration is very unpredictable.Trump has an unstable personality. He makes decisions not based on logic or the common good, but according to his desire, pride, and vanity. He has shown that he is willing to “make America great again” but at the expense of his allies (NATO countries generally). The recent fiasco of Trump revealing secrets (of Israel) to Russian Diplomats and in the process compromising the identity and safety of the pro-American spies is an example.

        If the cost of peace is for Trump to give Putin a free reign to expand its ambitions to revive the former Soviet Union (that is, re-conquest of former Soviet states), then is this really peace? Is this an acceptable compromise?

        The only reliable peace is the one that Our Lady of Fatima promised to the World. This can only come with the Consecration of Russia. Unfortunately, before we reach this stage of peace in the World, God’s Chastisement must first purify the Church and the World. This will remove the bad leadership and be replaced with the good leadership, hand picked by God.

        I think there is some good news, According to my Parish Priest, Russia is turning back the clock on abortions, that is becoming more pro-life. However, I think the motivation with the current Putin regime is to produce more Russian born citizens in order to increase numbers for the Russian military. You need manpower to re-establish an empire like the former USSR. Of course, when the Consecration of Russia has been performed, this anti-abortion pro-life Russian mentality will be the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and this good mentality will spread to the rest of the world, the same way that the errors of Russia spread to the rest of the World previously.

        I must disclose that I am not a fan of Putin and I am not a fan of Trump.

        What do you think?

        F & T in Christ

  6. Hi Aviso, ¿Why you are not accepting my comments? Don’t be jealous of my hard work and the wisdom that God has given me, I am only here to help, you have lack of knowledge about end times prophecies and catholic eschatology, that’s why you can’t publish an endtimes timetable that you promised a long time ago. Maybe you feel bad that I will point out your mistakes, you don’t need to hide or run away, don’t feel guilty for being wrong, feel guilty for not rectifying.

    • Hi Raymond, done, I am never Jealous and critics are good for my humility, I have never promised any endtimes timetable which is not the goal of this blog, I am also in contact with one of our best French eschatologue, so I am in Peace, for your information I already published your timetable, this is the second time and hopefully the last one, I respect your work and don’t forget to Pray for me, thanks.

  7. Pope Francis Canonizes the Great Child Saints of Fatima:

    Such a Cruel Irony
    by Joseph Cain
    May 15, 2017

    Today I was sad, here in Fatima, Portugal, while in the Sanctuary witnessing first-hand the Canonization ceremony. As soon as it ended, I went back to bed. I just could not take it. That was how it affected me personally. 
    Pope Francis recently identified himself as the “Bishop dressed in White” in the Third Secret text.  Today I watched this bishop dressed in white as he canonized the great child saints Jacinta and Francisco Marto.

    I thought that the comparison of their lives vs. his papacy was such acruelirony. Here is why: 
    My first point: the child Saint Francisco Marto loved the Blessed Sacrament profoundly! He spent hours every day in the church by himself adoring “the Hidden Jesus”. He cried when the parish priest would not let him receive Communion because the priest thought Francisco did not know his catechism well enough. Francisco, the Child Saint of Fatima, only received Holy Communion (the Host) once in his whole life — just before he died. It was with the greatest devotion and love that the child saint Francisco Marto honored Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament. Yet today I watched Pope Francis celebrate the Novus Ordo Canonization Mass, and in front of a million people — when he held up the Host and Chalice at the Consecrations for adoration by the faithful, as is his personal custom, he did not genuflect.

    Pope Francis never genuflects before the Blessed Sacrament. He does not even genuflect during his own Mass. Personally, I think this demonstrates in a public way that Francis perhaps does not believe in the divine presence of Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, and therefore he does not love the Blessed Sacrament. Today, in an unprecedented public display of apostasy, he failed to adore the Blessed Sacrament as being God really and truly present, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. Yet here at Fatima, Francis, so obviously disrespectful of the Blessed Sacrament — so obvious it was, in fact, that even the cameramen, themselves ashamed, zoomed out with the cameras when Pope Francis was supposed to genuflect — canonized the great child saint Francisco Marto, the child saint who on the contrary greatly lovedthe Blessed Sacrament.It seemed to me supremely and cruelly ironic. It made me so sad I almost cried.

     My second point: I reflected on the child Saint Jacinta, who was very pure and so intimate and close to Our Lady. The Mother of God revealed to the great child saint Jacinta Marto, “More souls go to hell for sins of the flesh than for any other reason.” Jacinta loved modesty in dress, and was so ashamed during her operation in Lisbon, just before she died, by having to be undressed on the operating table; and, in addition, she was fearful for the worldly nurses and others who might break the 6th Commandment. Jacinta had personally seen hell and this vision affected her even to the depths of her soul. Though only an innocent child, she was given special knowledge by the Mother of God about “sins of the flesh” as being the main reason why most sinners are lost. Jacinta was so beautifully chaste that during the several days after she died, before her body was put in a casket, it gave off a beautiful perfume, and this was a great miracle indicative of Jacinta’s great purity.

    Yet Francis has proclaimed universally and instituted as a practice with like-minded bishops in many dioceses, Holy Communion to be conceded to people in second marriages, those who have already been legitimately married in the Catholic Church who are now involved illegitimately in a second marriage — even without an annulment. These are people obviously breaking the law of Jesus Christ concerning Catholic marriage, breaking the 6th Commandment “Thou shall not commit adultery” as the Catholic Church has always defined it. Note well: this teaching is communicated in the Gospels by three of the Evangelists at least seven times: three times by St. Matthew, two times by St. Mark, and two times by St. Luke.
    So Francis canonizes the great child saint Jacinta, who, contrary to Pope Francis, with the holy fear of God, loved purity, chastity and certainly, without question, marital chastity. Jacinta was God’s chosen prophet, authorized by the Mother of God Herself, who told the faithful, that “more souls go to hell for sins of the flesh than for any other reason.”
    This reflection on chastity, regarding Saint Jacinta vs. Pope Francis, seemed to me yet again cruelly ironic, and made me even more sad and indignant at Francis, who refers to himself now, according to the Third Secret text, as merely “a Bishop dressed in White”. So today I thought to myself, I would want to ask Pope Francis these questions: “In the light of the Fatima Message, if you were to meet St. Jacinta and St. Francisco in person, what would you dare say to them? And, given this obvious and cruel irony that I have just pointed out to you, what exactly is the purpose of your papacy — the papacy of ‘the Bishop dressed in White?’”

    Finally, let me conclude by saying: I know a person who says faithfully the full fifteen-decade Rosary and, every day for more than twenty years, that person has offered the five Sorrowful Mysteries for the Pope. At this present hour in the history of the Church, we would all do well to imitate this practice, from today forward, with consistency and a sense of personal commitment.

    The intentions for the Sorrowful Mysteries that this person always offers, are: “For the Pope. For his spiritual, physical, mental health and well-being. For his spiritual enlightenment concerning Fatima, concerning Tradition. The same intentions for the next Pope. The same intentions for the Pope, whoever he may be, who will consecrate Russia to Our Lady.”


    My Comment : A “soldier” never weeps but fights for the truth of Christ and his commandments, the truth will make you free, Saint Michael the Archangel is my favorite Prayer (and my best Friend) after the our Father and Ave Maria, stay strong, we are close.

  8. Is the Bergoglian “Mary” Catholic? Come to think of it…

    On Friday, May 12, at the Chapel of the Apparitions in Fatima, Francis provided the following catechesis on Mary; a decidedly Bergoglian catechesis:

    “Pilgrims with Mary… But which Mary? A teacher of the spiritual life, the first to follow Jesus on the ‘narrow way’ of the cross by giving us an example, or a Lady ‘unapproachable’ and impossible to imitate? A woman ‘blessed because she believed’ always and everywhere in God’s words (cf. Lk 1:42.45), or a ‘plaster statue’ from whom we beg favours at little cost? The Virgin Mary of the Gospel, venerated by the Church at prayer, or a Mary of our own making: one who restrains the arm of a vengeful God; one sweeter than Jesus the ruthless judge; one more merciful than the Lamb slain for us?

    Let’s take a closer look at that which Francis clearly rejects:
    A Lady “unapproachable” and impossible to imitate…

    In other words, woe to those who believe that Our Lady “is to be venerated as something extraordinary, wonderful, eminently holy, and different from the conception of all other human beings” (Pope Pius IX, Ineffabilis Deus).  

    A “plaster statue” from whom we beg favours at little cost…
    In other words, woe to those who, like “our forebears, receive venerable images of Our Lady with deepest respect and who venerate them with magnificent honors; and their descendants, emulating their piety, continuing to cherish these images as highly sacred treasures” (cf Pope Leo XIII, Adiutricem).  
    One who restrains the arm of a vengeful God; one sweeter than Jesus the ruthless judge; one more merciful than the Lamb slain for us…

    In other words, woe to those who believe that the Blessed Virgin Mary “stands near the throne of God and when, because of men’s sins, He is about to submerge the world in a deluge of scourges, like a rainbow of peace she appears in His presence and appeases His wrath” (St. Antoninus of Florence).
    In sum, Woe to those who believe and behave as Catholics always have.   
    If nothing else, Francis is consistent.

    So, who is the Bergoglian “Mary”?
    It is the woman that he described standing at the foot of the Cross as follows:
    “She was silent, but in her heart, how many things told the Lord! ‘You, that day, this and the other that we read, you had told me that he would be great, you had told me that you would have given him the throne of David, his forefather, that he would have reigned forever and now I see him there!’ Our Lady was human! And perhaps she even had the desire to say: ‘Lies! I was deceived!’”

    For all intents and purposes, the Bergoglian “Mary” is the Mary of the Protestants; an honorable but otherwise ordinary woman.
    As such, no one can be surprised that he made a mockery of Our Lady at Fatima. We knew that he would, and we can be entirely certain that – barring a truly miraculous conversion – he will continue mocking her, denigrating those who are faithful to tradition, blaspheming Our Blessed Lord, and uttering all manner of heresies.
    With every passing day, it seems, we are given yet another reason to ponder the most pressing question facing, not just the Church, but indeed all of humankind:

    In what sense is this man even Catholic?  


    My Comment : I knew he will mock our Lady, the so called Bishop dressed in white, so the next question would be, could we have worse than this Pope ? Of course not, that’s the good news.

    • Aviso -.At least have the integrity to post this clarification. It will be my last. I will leave you and your cohort to swim around in your own septic tank. Having asked your opinion on the Pope’s claim to be a bishop dressed in white reflecting the words of sister Lucia I most utterly reject your responses and the filthy accusations you and your supporters level at The Holy Father Pope Francis. The only miraculous conversion required around here is yours and your supporters. I am out of here. May St Michael exercise his role as protector and cheif soldier of Mary and put a stop to your evil ways. It is up to God to condemn you, not me, but it us up to me to judge your words and the way of perdition that you encourage others to share with you. May God have mercy on your souls if that is still possible – having rejected the mission of mercy offered by His representative you may have already rejected the mercy of God Himself.

      • Done Joe, you look angry, I will Pray for you.

        PS : Your comment gave me a new idea, I will publish once or twice a week (will see) some insulting comments I received daily, To allow my readers to understand why I often ask them to pray for me and for the blog, thanks again.

      • Joe Crozier,

        It is sad to see you go. You will be another lost soul joining the ranks of misguided “Catholics” heading towards perdition.

        I am in agreement with Aviso, not because he indoctrinated me, but because like a lost lamb in the wilderness I found my own way back to Jesus Christ, as the shepherds were not around. The shepherds of this world are only interested in worldly things, things to do with placing human initiative at the top and trampling God, Christ, & Virgin Mary at the bottom. The shepherds of this world want to recreate God in their own Human Image.

        Francis is a Franciscan Jesuit. He believes in himself and human reason more than he believes in the salvation of God and Jesus and the intervention of Mother Virgin Mary. For his arrogance, Jesus has allowed the Real Remnant Catholics to see how Francis contradicts himself in every discourse. If you don’t believe me, believe in the prophecy of St Francis of Assisi regarding the last Pope.

        I summarize some of Francis’ bad works:

        1} In his visit to America under President Obama, Francis kept silent about the issue of Abortion. This is despite the fact that President Obama has the most vile and extreme position on abortion, where even if a child survives a late term abortion, it is still killed. In his silence, Francis condoned abortion. It is worse than this, Francis praised President Obama, in turn praising the practice of abortion. In the same breath, Francis told Catholics in America not to protest about abortion anymore. Why?

        2) With regards to Abortion, Francis rebuked a woman in Italy who when she got pregnant again and decided to keep the child, she gave birth to her eighth child, Francis gave a sermon about not breeding like rabbits.

        3) Francis said that the poor are the real Saints of God. Francis not only distorted the teachings of Jesus Christ, but he also neglected to mention who the real saints are: the one billion children whose lives were snuffed out in the womb in abortions. The statistics show that there is little difference between the poor, the wealthy, and the middle class in terms of committing sin. All are sinners as they all engage at some point in murder, stealing, committing adultery, having abortions and abusing little children (pedophilia), fornication, and many don’t believe in God. So why distort the teachings of Jesus Christ?

        4) Francis wants to institute the marriage of the Clergy and release them from the vow of celibacy. Well, I have serious concerns with Francis’ proposal. What if during the course of a married man’s priestly “career” the wife wants to dissolve the marriage or is unfaithful, having a sexual relationship with another man or god forbid another women from within members of the parish? Where would that leave the married priest? I go a step further, what if the wife demands a divorce and then decides to cohabit with another man or even decides to remarry? Would not both the married priest and wife be committing adultery? What happens if it is the married priest who is unfaithful, then decides to remarry after the divorce? Would not the married priest be living in grave sin? This is a truly realistic scenario.How could a Catholic priest be faithful to Jesus Christ in this scenario and perform his sacramental duties? What role model would the married priest be to his flock? Is the Roman Catholic Church going to adopt the policies of the heretical Church of England????

        5) Francis has turned a blind eye to priests who abuse children and sexually molest them. What ever happened to Jesus Christ’s teachings that if you harm a child, you harm Jesus himself and condemn yourself to God’s wrath? Why do you think the Irish abuse survivor Marie Collins resigned from the Child Protection Panel established by Pope Francis to address clerical sexual abuse despite the full support of Francis and his approval of all the commission’s recommendations? I will tell you why. Francis makes compromises in order to gain allies and support for his agenda. For example, the homosexual lobby within the Vatican is strong and Francis is happy to distort the teachings of Jesus Christ in order to get support and is happy to make alliances from despicable quarters

        6) The list goes on…

        Please stop being an apologist Francis. If you are a sincere Christian, then research the career of Pope Francis before you make accusations.

        It will be sad to see you go Joe Crozier. I will light a candle at Mass for you and other lost souls.

        Kind regards,
        Domenico Biasi
        F & T in Christ

      • Hi Joe, is PF correct to encourage the divorced and remarried to receive Holy Communion whilst not living as brother and sister? Is PF correct to encourage, before the whole world, blessings upon himself from priests of false Gods (Hindu, Moslem, Seek etc)? Is PF correct to encourage interfaith communion, when there is no communion of faith or belief in the Divine Presence. Is PF correct in his teaching that a sin is not a sin when it is a matter of subjective circumstance, and the list goes on and on does it not? A critique of that which PF pronounces is not a judgment of the man but of what he pronounces in light of Apostolic teaching. We are not obliged to follow in blind obedience Popes who contradict our Faith, only to pray for them. You express a distaste toward vociferous opinions concerning PF whilst you yourself do not hesitate to speak similarly of others, are we all not accorded the same respect, whether Pope or layman? If we exclude ourselves from every discussion because we cannot agree then the opportunity for persuading a balanced approach is lost. There is no doubt things are in a right mess just now and PF is principally responsible for adding to a situation that is leading toward schism. Are you seriously suggesting this situation does not represent an apostasy from the Faith, that it does not clearly reveal the Smoke of Satan infecting the Church, that all of this does not in fact relate to or correspond to numerous prophesied events, that all is well!

        God bless

  9. Aviso
    I think the mockery is of Our Lady. He mocks her role and claims we think her more important/powerful than the Trinity. Heaven forbid!! However, I sense some resentment of her role interceding and pleading for our attention. I recently heard aformer priest say that too much emphasis is placed on the Virgin Mary. It made me so sad.

    • Dear Mary Helen Morrow,

      You raise a good point. Pope Francis seems to think that Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary that is in the gospels is different to Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary that is in Fatima, Garabandal, La Sallette, Akita, Lourdes…etc. Yes you are correct, both Pope Francis and many other Clergy in the Church resent Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary because she justifiably exposes them for the bad & unfaithful people that they are.

      Since Vatican II there has been an active effort to marginalise Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary in order to keep the Protestants happy. Ecumenism in this respect is very damaging. This is because it corrupts the teachings of our Saviour Jesus Christ. For example, I live in Sydney, Australia in the Diocese of Broken Bay. The Bishop in my Diocese demands ecumenism and my Parish is too happy (in my opinion) to have joint services with a certain Father Rod Bower who is Archdeacon of the Central Coast in the Anglican Diocese of Newcastle. Father Rod Bower believes in abortion, gay marriage, gay priests, and sees nothing wrong with committing adultery (including unlimited marriage & divorce & marriages cycles). He also thinks that traditionalist Catholics and other conservative Christians are bigots, and he praises Muslims (even those who kill Christians) as being good religious people. The ecumenism services essentially demonstrates that the Roman Catholic Church in my area (and most likely all around the world) is okay with the views of Protestants (and sadly even Catholic Clergy) such as Father Rod Bower, and in the process this is causing confusion among the parishioners in my Parish.

      I have a feeling that Pope Francis, as well as a lot of priests, Bishops and Cardinals are atheists. They are only career people in the Church, so they see nothing wrong with pushing a progressive (and heretical) agenda. They resent Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary’s intervention, because it takes the limelight away from them and they insult her with the left hand and then they pretend to praise her with the right hand. Such clergy see nothing wrong with corrupting the teachings of Jesus Christ. I say they are atheists because they do not fear God and Jesus Christ when they insult Our Blessed Virgin Mother Mary.

      What are your thoughts anyone?

      F & T in Christ

      • Hi Domenico, Francis is not atheist, he believes in God but not in a Catholic God, Francis is a modernist heretic and indoctrinated by communism and its dérivatives for years (relativism, theology of liberation, ecumenism, Socialism, protestantism, modernism….etc…= the so called errors of Russia denounced precisely in Fatima) which is even worse than atheism, they want a Church without dogma, without Commandments, the so called God of Mercy, this new Church prophesied by Blessed Catherine Emmerich, they are Dangerous, on the road to Perdition for years and are taking many souls with them, as most do not believe in hell, so for them our Lady of Fatima can only be a mockery but they feared her as well because they know also that at the end her immaculate Heart will Triump and that she has already crushed his head.

        A last word to conclude, as their time is near the end, it is that time also they are the most Dangerous, so don’t forget your Rosaries, the best “weapon” given to us by our Lady against any hérésies.

    • Hi Jochen
      I’m not sure what your question relates to and not wishing to pre-empt Aviso’s reply but I think 1929 was when The Immacualta first requested the consecration of Russia.
      PS no scan arrived.

      • “In 1929 Lúcia Santos was a novice at the Sisters of St. Dorothy convent in Tuy, Spain. Lúcia reported that on the night of 13 June 1929, while she was praying in chapel, that she experienced a vision in which the Blessed Virgin said that it was God’s will that the Pope, in union with all the Bishops of the world, consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart. Sister Lúcia reported this to her confessor who asked her to write it down.”

    • Hi Jochen Gallob,

      I think I can provide an explanation. I wrote about it in the blog page titled, Garabandal why 2018 ? UPDATE. Please navigate there for other interesting information.

      But for now, I will copy and paste a small excerpt of what I wrote:

      “The year 2017 will be exactly 100 years since 1917 of the Fatima apparitions. I recall the prophecy of Jesus given to the French Monarchy about instituting the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. The French Monarchs refused and 100 years later the Bourbon lineage of the French Monarchy ended with the execution of King Louis XVI in the French Revolution. Apparently, King Louis XVI, just before his execution, instituted the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, but it was too late to save him. This is the analogy that can be made with Fatima and the Roman Catholic Church. However, although the Marian messages of Fatima began in 1917, the Holy Madonna only introduced the idea (with no specifics) for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 1917. The Holy Madonna gave more detailed information about her request for the Consecration of Russia, and the manner in which it is to be done 12 years later in 1929. Thus, it is possible that the 100 years date for the Roman Catholic Church [in terms of performing the Consecration of Russia] may have a maximum deadline date of 2029 [2017 + 12 years = 2029]. ”

      I am in agreement with Aviso, and consider that the Consecration of Russia will take place a lot sooner. I hope so anyway.

      F & T in Christ

      • The Deadline doesn’t seem to be 2017 neither 2029, but any time after 2017 and before 2024. The triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary should take place before May 2026 according to prophecy of St Bosco.

    • Hi Jochen, in my opinion many are wrong about this Year 2029 as usualy they adds 100 years (related to the Kings of France) to the year 1929 when our Lady Appeared to Sister Lucia in Tuy (Spain) on June 13, 1929, that was the day when she announced “the moment has come for God to ask the Holy Father to make, in union with all the bishops of the world, the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart. By this means, He promises to save Russia.” then they conclude that the Deadline (100 Years later) is de facto the year 2029….etc…

      The problem with this Possibility and the year 2029 is that most forgets the first time when this topic of a Consecration of Russia was indicated by our Lady on July 13, 1917, the same day when the Fatima Secrets were given to the little Sheperds, it was that day of July 1917 that the Blessed Mother spoke for the first time about The Consecration of Russia, in this apparition of July 13, Our Lady warned the three seers that if people did not stop offending God, He would punish the word using Russia as His chosen instrument of chastisement. that day (and not in 1929) also She told them “to prevent this, I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart”, indeed she was back to Sister Lucia on June 1929 as promised then She said “the Moment has come…etc….”, the Moment has come means NOW (TODAY) and not you have more or less 100 Years as many think so if we believe that the Dealine is really 100 Years, the Year to be taken into account regarding the Consecration of Russia is Probably the Year 1917, when she spoke about it for the first time, the Vision of the 3rd Secret (A Bishop Dressed in white + The Holy Father = 2 Persons = 2 Popes) can only confirm this argument and strangely this is exactly what we are currently living in Rome today 100 years later, this argument is also a Fact for most Fatima Scholars as well.

      • Dear Aviso,

        Your comment about the two Popes in the context of the Vision of the 3rd Secret is very intelligent. You are very wise.

        When I mentioned the year 2029, I did it to be intellectually honest. I do not want any lies to exist between me and Jesus Christ,

        As you said, the first time this topic of a Consecration of Russia was indicated by our Lady was on July 13, 1917. The only complication (in my mind) is that the Popes did not know how to perform the Consecration back in 1917 because our Lady did not explain how to. The explanation came when our Lady returned back to Sister Lucia on June 1929. It then was known that all the Bishops of the World must participate with the Pope to Consecrate Russia, in order for the Consecration to be accepted by Our lady.

        Thus, I am only suggesting that 2029 may be the maximum allowable deadline for the Papacy. It does not mean that we have to wait until 2029.

        As you pointed out about the two Popes in the context of he Vision of the 3rd Secret (A Bishop Dressed in white + The Holy Father = 2 Persons = 2 Popes), is a good argument that the Consecration of Russia will happen a lot sooner than later.

        Each time an attempt was made in the past by a Pope to Consecrate Russia, it was not valid. This is because the Roman Catholic Church is full of disunity and all the Bishops of the World in a combined way refuse to participate in the Consecration.

        In my mind a major World War must break out first in which many clergy (priests, bishops, Cardinals) are killed. So when only a handful of Bishops remain in the world, it then becomes possible for the Consecration of Russia to be made in the correct way (according to Our Lady Blessed Virgin Mary) where the remaining Bishops in the world will cooperate with the Pope,

        Therefore, if you consider the hostile geopolitics of the world today (China, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Iran, and the rest of the Muslim world that want to kill all Christians), I anticipate that the Consecration of Russia will happen soon. Perhaps close to the time of the Great Miracle of Garabandal.

        F & T in Christ.

      • Dear Aviso,

        I think I misunderstood you. When Our Lady Appeared to Sister Lucia in 1929 to request the Consecration of Russia, she wanted the Pope to do it in 1929. But the Pope did not do it.

        I have a new idea I want to share with you. It is about Conchita’s prediction of the last three Popes, where after this we enter the End Times. Pope John Paul II was the last of the three Popes. Do you agree with this?

        This means that Pope Benedict XVI (The Holy Father) and Pope Francis (A Bishop Dressed in white) are the people in the Vision of the 3rd Secret as you suggest, and they are End Times Popes. If this is correct, have we have entered the Tribulation Times described in the Bible (Book of Revelation)?

        Could the dates 2017 to 2029 be the period of the End Times Tribulation? Then at some point within these dates, the Consecration of Russia is performed, and then from 2029 and onward will be the time when the Period of Peace that is granted to the world begins, as promised by Our Lady of Fatima?

        F & T in Christ

      • Hi Domenico, below my answers :

        I think I misunderstood you. When Our Lady Appeared to Sister Lucia in 1929 to request the Consecration of Russia, she wanted the Pope to do it in 1929. But the Pope did not do it.

        Aviso : Yes I confirm, this was the wish of our Lady, so Pope Pius XI was the first Pope in charge to consecrate Russia, we know the rest…..

        I have a new idea I want to share with you. It is about Conchita’s prediction of the last three Popes, where after this we enter the End Times. Pope John Paul II was the last of the three Popes. Do you agree with this?

        Aviso : The Truth must be said once and for all, the Lady of the Mount Carmel Prophesied 4 Popes then the end of the Times exactly and not 3 as confirmed by the Seer from the Beginning but 1 Pope will have a short Pontificate, this was without doubt Pope John Paul 1 so probably to avoid any Scandal or any condemnation from the Church, especially when you may know why Pope John Paul 1 will have a short reign then the main Seer confirmed and several times (last month again to one of my friend who knows her for years) the official and Public version “3 Popes then the end of the Times” only, we must respect it as she has probably a very good reason. So the end of the Times will begin at the Death of Pope Benedict or already started the day of his Resignation (that’s what I think), in other words, the Pontificate of Pope Francis has not been taken into account in our Lady’s of the Mount Carmel Prophecy of Popes and if you ask me why ? publicly I don’t know.

        This means that Pope Benedict XVI (The Holy Father) and Pope Francis (A Bishop Dressed in white) are the people in the Vision of the 3rd Secret as you suggest, and they are End Times Popes. If this is correct, have we have entered the Tribulation Times described in the Bible (Book of Revelation)?

        Aviso : Yes this is Correct, we are currently living Biblical Tribulations described in the Apocalypse of Saint John, few are aware yet, the World will understand it the Day of the Warning, which will be like a Catastrophe for the World, many will think about the end of the World that Day, let me recall that nobody should wait for the Warning Day but rather be ready

        Could the dates 2017 to 2029 be the period of the End Times Tribulation? Then at some point within these dates, the Consecration of Russia is performed, and then from 2029 and onward will be the time when the Period of Peace that is granted to the world begins, as promised by Our Lady of Fatima?

        Aviso : Correct as well

  10. For your information, I had written an article about the Papacy and Fatima yesterday but I deleted it this morning as the same topic will be included in my next update of my Fatima 3rd Secret online article, thank you.

    • Hi Aviso

      I think Francis has made it clear that he is (or believes he is) the Bishop in White. He also quite obviously walks slowly with faltering steps as in the Vision. But why is his statement making a mockery of the Third Secret?

      Also on the plane back to Rome he said the Mother of Jesus is not appearing in Medjugorje. He said the Ruini report expresses doubts but he personally does not believe in Medjugorje, “the messages have no value”

      • Hi Dennis,

        I was reading through some of Aviso’s blogs (Francis, the beginning of the end ? Part V) and I came across a very recent comment (Yesterday, 13 /05 2017) from Juan. I have reproduced it below as I think it will answer you questions.

        F & T in Christ


        05/13/2017 AT 16 H 02 MIN
        These are some of Pope Francis words last night. It leaves me extremely depressed since I understand a kind of mocking of the vision of Our Lady detaining the Angel ready to punish the earth.

        Infovaticana reports the following:

        The Pope explains in Fatima the true veneration to the Virgin Mary

        “Pilgrims with Mary … What Mary? The Virgin Mary of the Gospel, venerated by the praying Church, or rather a Mary portrayed by subjective sensibilities, as stopping the Justice arm of God ready to punish: a Mary better than Christ, considered as an implacable judge; more merciful than the Lamb who has sacrificed himself for us?

      • Hi Dennis, why it is a mockery ? Because Francis is in the 3rd Secret, simple as that, not by name but by description, in other words, the so called Bishop dressed in white of the Vision, this was my opinion from the beginning of this Pontificate and in my humble opinion it looks that I could have been right.

        About Medjugorje, we did not need Francis, each of you knows my position about Medjugorje for years.

  11. The Lady of the Mount Carmel and the Fatima 3rd Secret within 3 main details :

    1. The Fatima 3rd Secret Format : About 25 Lines, we owe this important detail to Bishop Venancio (the former Bishop of Fatima), one of our Greatest Garabandalist, he met the main Garabandal seer twice recommended to him by Sister Lucia herself, wihout Bishop Venancio, each of us would have believed Rome in 2000 and their 60 Lines about the Secret, which was the Description of the Fatima 3rd Secret vision only, thanks to our Lady of Mount Carmel

    2. Father Gruner, the World Champion of the Fatima Cause, called also the Fatima Priest, it is in Garabandal in 1965 that for the first time the Fatima Priest was aware of the Fatima Message, thanks again to our Lady of the Mount Carmel

    3. What about the Good timetable of the Fatima 3rd Secret ? well Malachi Martin and Pope Benedict are to me the next on the list, both were Garabandalist from the beginning so let me recall their Timetable :

    Malachi Martin (1998) : “It is not 200 years away, it is not 50 years away, it is not 20 years away”

    Pope Benedict (2010) : “May the seven years which separate us from the centenary of the apparitions hasten the fulfilment of the prophecy of the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, to the glory of the Most Holy Trinity.”, thanks again to our Lady of the Mount Carmel.

  12. In light of Fr. Kramer’s description of the prophecy of Zachary, I am puzzled about your embrace of Putin. Leaving aside the question of America’s role in aggravating hostilities, this prophecy confirms, a la lettre, the testimony of Anatoliy Golitsyn, a high ranking defector from the USSR in the 1960s, that the fall of communism would be a staged event, designed to fool the West. Both Gorbachev and Putin are on record (and at least the latter, on videotape) confirming their continued adherence to communism.

    • Within few words Mary Helen, The warning as the Chastisement are sure and cannot be avoided anymore, Conchita won’t be alive apparently at the time of the Chastisement.

      My Comment : I Need to check the last part about Conchita and the Chastisement as new to me.

  13. One of the best video about the Fatima 3rd Secret, To listen to have the basics of the probable content of the secret, especially about the last events at the end of the times, called also the Novissimi, this is what our Lady of the Carmel prophesied in Garabandal when she said 3 Popes then end of the times, in other words our Lady revealed the Secret herself in Garabandal, timetable included :

  14. Hello Aviso and esrpecially , hello Joe!
    Today I´m going to give you the main information of the book “Garabandal – Der Zeigefinger Gotte by Albrecht Weber.Read carefully: In the second extended edition of Garabandal, published in Wega Verlag, we find in the chapter The warning on page 127, the following inscription from the author. This is followed by the original German text:……..Niemand kann mehr verhindern, dass diese Ankündigung. oder Vorwarnung vor dem Strafgericht eintrifft. Daß sie kommt ist ganz gewiß, obwohl ich weder den Tag noch die Stunde kenne.” Conchita bemerkte weiterhin dazu, daß die “Scheidung der Geister” kommen werde. Ferner sagte sie 1998, daß sie sich selbst sehr vor der Warnung fürchtet. Zugleich sagte sie aber auch, daß sie das Strafgericht nicht mehr erleben wird. Ob es ihre Kinder noch erleben werden könne sie nicht mit Gewißheit sagen. Conchita war zu diesem Zeitpunkt 49 Jahre alt.
    I personally received this extended edition of this book from Albrecht Weber personally, the book is at my home. I
    also had contact with Joey Lomangino. He sent me the Brown Scapulier from Mount Carmel from New York.
    Look at the messages of Our Lady of. the Mt. Carmel:
    The Messages of Our Lady at Garabandal
    The First Message
    OCTOBER 18, 1961
    Our Lady of GarabandalWe must make many sacrifices, perform much penance, and visit the Blessed Sacrament frequently. But first, we must lead good lives. If we do not, a chastisement will befall us. The cup is already filling up, and if we do not change, a very great chastisement will come upon us.
    The Second Message
    JUNE 18, 1965
    As my message of October 18 has not been complied with and has not been made known to the world, I am advising you that this is the last one. Before, the cup was filling up. Now it is flowing over.
    Many cardinals, many bishops and many priests are on the road to perdition and are taking many souls with them. Less and less importance is being given to the Eucharist. You should turn the wrath of God away from yourselves by your efforts.
    If you ask for His forgiveness with sincere hearts, He will pardon you. I, your mother, through the intercession of Saint Michael the Archangel, ask you to amend your lives. You are now receiving the last warnings.
    I love you very much and do not want your condemnation. Pray to us with sincerity and we will grant your requests. You should make more sacrifices. Think about the passion of Jesus.
    For the Glory of God!

  15. Yes Mae, the timing of the Fatima 3rd Secret is within the Vision of that Secret, revealed by the Vatican in 2000, especially this part :

    “And we saw in an immense Light that is God, something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it, a Bishop dressed in white. We had the impression that it was the Holy Father”

    My own research confirms that this part of the Vision concerns a Pontificate with 2 Popes, A Bishop Dressed in White + The Holy Father de facto Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, this is today a fact to me.

    Russia is the main key of the Fatima “saga”, The next Russian Election being next Year (2018) with probably a new mandat of Putin for 6 More years, unfortunately this scenario is not acceptable for these forces indicated by Paul Craig Roberts in his article, de facto the War is probably to our door, unless the Consecration is made before which is unlikely.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s