01 May 2017

Pope John XXIII, opening speech at the Council, 1962

“We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world was at hand.”

Washington Plans to Nuke Russia and China

April 27, 2017

Paul Craig Roberts

Not everyone likes to hear about the threat of nuclear war. Some find refuge in denial and say that nuclear war is impossible because it makes no sense. Unfortunately, humankind has a long record of doing things that make no sense.

In previous posts in recent years I have pointed out both written documents and changes in US war doctrine that indicate that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia and China. More recently, I have shown that Washington’s demonization of Russia and President Putin, the incessant lies about Russian deeds and intentions, and the refusal of Washington to cooperate with Russia on any issue have convinced the Russian government that Washington is preparing the Western populations for an attack on Russia. It is obvious that China has come to the same conclusion.

It is extremely dangerous to all of mankind for Washington to convince two nuclear powers that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear strike against them. It is impossible to imagine a more reckless and irresponsible act. Yet this is precisely what Washington has done.

Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff has concluded that Washington in pursuit of global hegemony is implementing an anti-ballistic missile system that Washington believes can prevent a Russian nuclear response to a US pre-emptive attack. http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/04/us-forces-preparing-sudden-nuclear.html

Careful studies have convinced the Russians that Washington is investing in and arranging components that have no other function than to devastate Russia and cripple the country’s retaliatory capability. In short, Washington is preparing to launch a nuclear war. https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/

As I explained previously, the theory behind this insane scheme is that after America’s preemptive strike Russia will be so devastated that Russia would not retaliate with any remaining forces out of fear that Washington would launch a second major strike. Washington also plans to use agents in place to assassinate as many members as possible of the Russian government, thus leaving the government in confusion without leadership.

Yes, the insane American/Israeli neoconservatives are this determined to exercise hegemony over the world.

Yes, Washington is sufficiently criminally insane to risk the destruction of life on earth based on the supposition that Washington’s offense will work perfectly and Russia and China’s capabilities will be so degraded that no retaliatory response will occur.

One might hope that the American and Western populations would be outraged that Washington is so power-crazed that Washington is subjecting all life to such risks. But there is no sign of an anti-war movement. The Western leftwing has degenerated into Identity Politics in which the only threat comes from white heterosexual males who are portrayed as misogynists, racists, and homophopes. The Western leftwing is no longer war-conscious. Indeed, the leftwing has become diverted into such silly irrelevancies as transgender rights to toilets of their choice. The impotence of the Western left is so overwhelming that the left might as well not exist.

Where then is the hope? Russia and China cannot simply sit there and await America’s preemptive nuclear strike.

Possibly Washington does not intend a preemptive strike, but only to convince Russia and China that Washington’s preparations give Washington so much predominance in a conflict that Russia and China will submit to Washington’s hegemony. But this interpretation of Washington’s intention implies no less risk. Why would Russia and China wait for Washington to complete its preparations for war, preparations that permit Washington to turn Russia and China into puppet states?

The US military/security complex has clearly prevailed over Trump’s intention to normalize relations between the US and Russia, and anti-Russian venom continues to pour out of NATO and Washington’s European vassal states. The majority of the American people seem to have accepted the propaganda that Russia is the number one threat to the United States. With propaganda controlling the explanation, Washington’s aggressive actions are explained as defense against a threat and not as a policy that will end life on earth.

The chances are high that life on earth is approaching its end. The responsibility lies heavily on the American people, whose success, due to the mistakes of others, made Americans think that they are exceptional and privileged. Unaware of the inhumane threat to all life that is embodied in the neoconservative claim that Americans are exceptional and indispensable, the self-satisfied American public is unaware of the consequences of such hubris. Hubris is leading them, and the entire world, to slaughter in thermo-nuclear war.

The neoconservative claim of American exceptionalism is the identical claim made for Germans by Hitler. If Americans are indispensable, everyone else is dispensable and can be “bombed into the stone age” as one US government official put it, or nuked as Washington intends to do to Russia and China. The claim of American exceptionalism is not accepted by Russia and China. Therefore, the insane, crazed monsters who rule over the West in Washington are bringing life on earth to an end.

And there are no protests. The idiot British, the idiot Germans, the idiot French, Italians, Canadians, Australians, Belgians, Greeks, Portuguese, Spanish, Japanese, rally behind the insanity that is Washington.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/27/washington-plans-nuke-russia-china/

And so apparently do the American people, a population stupid beyond all belief.

My Comment : Within 13 questions :

1. Is this Scenario possible ? Yes
2. When ? No one knows when exactly but To me Probably this year or nex Year according to my own research, that’s for the bad news
3. Can we trust Paul Craig Roberts ? I know him for years via the Fatima Center, so Yes without a doubt
4. Is this Scnenario related to Fatima ? Yes and more precisely to the Annihilation of Nations indicated in the Fatima 2nd Secret
5. Can it be avoided ? Yes but with the Consecration of Russia only and at the latest this Year
6. By whom this terrible scenario can be avoided ? By the Pope of the Catholic Church
7. Is this Scnenario related to Garabandal ? Yes, more precisely to the Garabandal Warning
8. Who are responsible ? ALL of us but especially each Pope of the Catholic Church from Pius XI to the current one
9. What can the faithful do ? Praying especially the Rosary, the Sacrament of the Eucharist (Mass) and the Sacrament of confession then be ready at anytime, to me especially during the Period May 2017 to October 2017 and this explains why I am writting this article today
10. Is not too late ? After October 2017, it will be probably too late
11. How can you be sure ? 9 Years with Fatima and 10 Years with Garabandal have been to me sufficient to get probably and unfortunately the good scenario as the good timing
12. What else ? This scenario was possible during a Pontificate with 2 Popes only, de facto those are the times we are currently living
13. “We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world was at hand.” ? Unfortunately Pope John was wrong.

 

Malachi Martin : “What’s wrong, Your Eminence?’ I asked him”

Cardinal Bea : “We’ve just killed a billion people. Look at this!”

 

1960 : Few minutes after having read the Fatima 3rd Secret

 

 

A Last word : Probably one my most difficult article to write.

02 May 2017

PART 2

Malachi Martin and the Garabandal Warning

Interview with Bernard Janzen about Fr Malachi Martin’s message for our times

I had the honour of interviewing Bernard Janzen, a Canadian Catholic Journalist who during the 1990’s conducted a series of interviews with Fr. Malachi Martin regarding the state of the Catholic Church and the world at the time.  The talks are incredibly interesting and show the great faith that both men have in Our Lord Jesus and His Church.

While many churchmen during that time had been leading a “reform” of the Church; Martin and Janzen were expounding the school of thought that Vatican II had gone too far with its subsequent initiatives and the so-called “spirit” of the Council that many clergy and churchmen used to radically change the Faith and its practice.

The interview is timely because recently the documentary, Hostage to the Devil which chronicles Fr. Martin’s life and his work in the field of exorcism was released on Netflix.  For those of you who wish to examine and further explore Mr. Janzen’s work with Fr Martin his website is www.truimphcommunications.net. The interviews are also available on Youtube.

What did you think of the recently made documentary Hostage to the Devil which examined Fr. Martin’s life and his work in the mysterious world of exorcisms?

This documentary was not produced from a Catholic perspective.  It received funding from the Irish government, examining the life of an Irishman who attained success in the larger world.  Hostage to the Devil was intended for a general audience, thus engaging the scepticism which the general public has about the existence of the devil and exorcisms.  Due to time constraints, the documentary did attempt to cover all aspects of Fr. Martin’s life; it focused on his work as an exorcist.

Hostage to the Devil did a good job of recreating the drama surrounding the mysterious circumstances of Fr. Martin’s death, portraying the heightened emotions of this tumultuous time.  The documentary introduces its audience to Fr. Martin’s unique perspective on exorcism, possession, and the activity of the devil in the modern world.

The documentary gave a platform to Robert Kaiser to malign the reputation of Fr. Martin.  Many of the statements made by Kaiser were not true.  In her book, The Desolate City, Anne Roche Muggeridge describes Kaiser as a journalist who is incapable of distinguishing fact from fantasy.  As a modernist, it could not be expected that Kaiser would have a favourable opinion of a staunch traditionalist like Fr. Martin, but his accusations often descended to the level of calumny.  Kaiser said that Fr. Martin eventually began to believe his own lies.  What lies?  In my years of interviewing Fr. Martin, he made a deeply felt defense of Catholic truth.  I would invite anyone to listen to these interviews and decide for themselves if Fr. Martin was genuine or not.

On balance, the production of Hostage to the Devil is a positive development because it increases the awareness of its viewers of Malachi Martin and his message for our times.

How did you come to do multiple interviews with Fr. Martin in the 1990’s and why are these recordings important today?

I was impressed with the writings of Fr. Martin, especially his book The Jesuits.  During the late 1980’s, Fr. Martin was reaching out to some of the authors of the traditional movement.  Two of these authors helped me to make contact with Fr. Martin, who agreed to do a set of interviews.  The first set of interviews, Catholicism Overturned, was successful and so we decided to do a set of interviews annually, a process which continued until Fr. Martin’s tragic death.

These interviews are important today because they were so prophetic.  He foresaw developments such as homosexual marriage and papal resignation long before they became a reality.  Today, with the Catholic religion in the iron grip of an unprecedented crisis, Fr. Martin’s warnings on the state of the Church are more apparent than they were in the last decade of his life, in the evening of Pope John Paul II’s reign.

Fr. Martin not only explained what was happening.  He explained why these events were happening.  He provided a unique perspective on geopolitical and ecclesiastical events by explaining the critical role of the supernatural realm.

What do you suppose Fr. Martin would say about the current situation in the Church?

He would almost certainly say that events are unfortunately unfolding as he expected.  The modern-day apostasy, or loss of belief, is deepening.  In the last decade of his life, Fr. Martin stated that we are in the early stages of what could be called the great apostasy.  Today, we are in the midst of it.

The Church has recently crossed three thresholds in what Pope Paul VI described as the auto-demolition of the Church.  First, the papal resignation that Fr. Martin prophetically foresaw has happened, diminishing the status of the Papacy.  Monarchs don’t resign; ordinary officials do.  Secondly, there are now open divisions in the College of Cardinals.  Prior to this pontificate, differences in opinion obviously existed, but public disagreements did not exist.  Today, cardinals are publicly taking opposing positions on matters of faith and morals.  Some cardinals state that to give the sacraments to divorced and remarried couples is contrary to traditional practise; other cardinals openly support this innovation.  Thirdly, different jurisdictions in the Church have conflicting rules on a matter of moral discipline.  In Poland, the traditional practice of not giving Holy Communion to divorced and remarried couples is retained.  In the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires, divorced and remarried couples may receive Holy Communion.  This situation of discrepancy on a matter of moral discipline is unprecedented.  Is the Catholic Church still universal?

The core of Fr. Martin’s message remains unchanged.  Fr. Martin is like the Old Testament prophets who rebuked their people for falling away from their faith.  Fr. Martin has rebuked today’s political leaders and churchmen who have departed from the faith of our fathers and decided to go their own way.  In the book The Eternal War, Fr. Martin states, “This new world order is not the rule of God.  It cannot succeed!  It cannot have God’s blessing.”

Fr. Martin was a devotee of Fatima and also spoke of other twentieth century apparitions like Akita and Garabandal.  He spoke often to you about “Our Lady coming in the sky to rescue us.”  Can you elaborate about his thoughts in this area and what it means to our present day.

What I believe Fr. Martin is referring to is the warning spoken of by Our Lady in her appearances at Garabandal.  Fr. Martin believed that Garabandal was an authentic apparition of Our Lady.  According to the warning, there will be some unforeseen astronomical activity.  This is why Fr. Martin has sometimes said to watch the skies.  Everyone at a certain point in time will know the state of their soul.  They will know how they stand before God.  It will be a most frightening experience for many souls.

What do you want people to know about Fr. Martin and his life and times?

Fr. Martin said that when he grew up in Catholic Ireland, one could hardly ever fail, morally or spiritually.  If your parents didn’t catch you, then your school teacher, your neighbors, your pastor, or the local policeman would catch you.  In our day, this idyllic world has been transformed into a hostile environment, where a degenerate culture acts to break down the faith and morals of today’s families.  Fr. Martin’s wide range of experiences and incredible mind enabled him to become God’s instrument in explaining what has happened to our Church and civilization.   No other individual has developed as complete and prophetic an explanation of our times.  This explanation includes the pivotal and largely undetected influence of the supernatural dimension, which of course goes unreported by mainstream media coverage of news events.

Where can one access your work with Fr. Martin to learn further of his life and work?

During the last decade of Fr. Martin’s eventful life, I conducted eight sets of recorded interviews with this incredible mind.  Our apostolate, Triumph Communications, has transcribed these recorded interviews and published them as a box set of eight books, entitled The Wisdom of the Ages.  More information about these books is available on our website at http://www.triumphcommunications.net.  On our website, there are also several articles about Fr. Martin and his message for our times.

https://www.ewtn.co.uk/news/catholic-commentary/interview-with-bernard-janzen-about-fr-malachi-martin-s-message-for-our-times

 

07 May 2017

PART 3 Fatima

13 questions sent to me about the Fatima 3rd Secret and my answers :

1. Do you know the main Contents of the Fatima 3rd Secret ? In my humble opinion Probably or unfortunately
2. Have you read the text ? No but I worked on this text of 25 lines for almost 10 Years
3. Is a 3rd World War announced in the 3rd Secret ? Yes as the winner and the loss, probably just before the conclusion of the text “In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world”
4. Is there a timetable in the text ? Yes and related to the Papacy
5. Why no Pope wanted to reveal this text to this day ? Because the Text talks about some of them as about the Last one before the Consecration
6. Is Vatican II indicated in the Text ? Yes but not as Vatican II, our Lady talks about a very bad Council (to be diplomatic) and probably at the beginning of the text just 1 or 2 lines after “In Portugal the Dogma of the Faith will be always Preserved….etc…”
7. Why Sister Lucia had a hart time writting the text ? Because of the Apostasy prophesied within the Church and some strong words from the Blessed Mother about the Papacy
8. What about the terrible part of the Secret indicated by some Fatima Scholars ? This part concerns Salvation of souls and has been disclosed by our Lady of the Mount Carmel in Garabandal within her second Message
9. Was Russia Consecrated in 1984 by Pope John Paul II ? No, Russia was never Consecrated as requested by none of the Pope from Pope Pius XI (for example this Great Pope received several requests included from Sister Lucia to consecrate Russia as soon as possible and so on for the next Popes) to the current one
10. Why ? Pius XI for some Geopolitical Reasons, Pius XII because he was not sure of the exact contents of the 3rd Secret, from Pope John XXIII to the current Pope Because the Consecration is related to the 3rd Secret, if today the Pope Consecrates Russia as requested, he must de facto reveal the Secret or vice versa
11. What are your sources regarding your personnal research ? in my humble opinion I’ve studied the work of our best Fatima Scholars, from Father Alonso, Father Gruner….etc…to the best French Fatima Scholars, including De Sainte Marie, Frère Michel, Father Caillon…etc….
12. Is the Secret Apocalyptic ? The 3rd Secret is related to the end of the Times from the Book of the Revelation of St John, called also the Novissimi.
13. To be Continued.

 

On this French Election Day, Make it known to my Ministers….etc….video from Father Gruner. Vive la France, Fille Ainée de l’Eglise !

 

 

08 May 2017

PART 4 Fatima

Few more questions about Fatima and my answers :

13. Is there a deadline to Consecrate Russia ? Yes and the deadline is related to the Vision of the 3rd Secret

14. What is the Vision of the Secret ? The Vision represents an Apocalyptic Picture of Rome, A Bishop dressed in White and the Holy Father killed by soldiers

15. Is this Vision related to the Secret ?  Yes the 3rd Secret explains that Vision as the Bishop dressed in White and Why the Pope is Killed

16. About the Deadline, 2017 or 2029 ? probably 2017

17. Are the Bishop dressed in white and the Holy Father, 2 different Persons ? Yes

18. Is the Vision a literal or a concrete view of the Future ? The vision is a concret future event of the Church, Nothing literal within Fatima, from the 1st to the last Secret

19. When The Consecration of Russia will be done ? During or after the War

20. What about the 3rd Secret ? The Secret will be lived then revealed

21. Did the Secret talks about a Pope Under the Control of Satan ? Yes, the last one before the Consecration

22. Is Fatima a Public or a Private Revelation ? Fatima is the Future of the Church so of the World, de facto Fatima concerns all of us and cannot be considered as a private Revelation

23. Is Pope Benedict Resignation related to the Fatima 3rd Secret ? Yes probably

24. Is Garabandal a continuation of Fatima ? Yes and this explains why Garabandal is not approved by the Church

25. Is Akita a continuation of Fatima ? No Akita is a continuation of Garabandal only as Fatima is a continuation of La Salette, Akita talks about the Sign left by my Son, this is the Permanent Sign prophesied in Garabandal by our Lady of the Mount Carmel

26. Is the Garabandal Prophecy of Popes related to the 3rd Secret ? Yes and probably the main reason why Garabandal was not approved by the Church.

27. Can the Consecration of Russia be done before a new World War ? Yes but unlikely, in any case we must Pray for that

28. To be continued.

 

3rd Secret Chronology from John Salza, perfect from a Fatima Scholars, to Watch in full and without hesitation, enjoy !

 

13 May 2017

PART 5  The Bishop Dressed in white

Francis Says That He Is the
“Bishop Dressed in White”

by Christopher A. Ferrara
May 12, 2017

Tomorrow, at Fatima, Pope Francis will canonize Jacinta and Francisco, further enshrining the Fatima event in the life of the Church by raising two of three Fatima seers to the altars. In yet another twist to the labyrinthine mystery of the Third Secret, however, the prayer he will recite at the Fatima shrine contains this astonishing declaration:

“Hail Mother of Mercy, Lady of the white robe! At this place where one hundred years ago you showed all the designs of our God’s mercy, I look upon your robe of light and, as bishop dressed in white [como bispo vestido de branco], I remember all those who, robed in baptismal white, want to live in God and pray the mysteries of Christ to attain peace.”

Pope Bergoglio’s self-description as a “bishop dressed in white” clearly evokes the vision pertaining to the Third Secret, published on June 26, 2000, whose textual description, recorded by Sister Lucia, includes the following: “And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’.”

This is surely no coincidence, but rather an intended allusion. For Pope Bergoglio’s reference to white baptismal robes is not particularly relevant to the occasion tomorrow. Rather, it seems designed to set up a reference to himself as a bishop dressed in white.

This raises a curious point concerning what Sister Lucia recorded. Why did she write concerning the mysterious “Bishop dressed in White” that “we had the impression that it was the Holy Father”? Why only an “impression”? Did not Our Lady inform the seers exactly who the white-clad bishop was? After all, She was perfectly clear about every other detail of the Message of Fatima, including the very name of the Pope (Pius XI) who would be reigning when World War II began. Why would Our Lady identify by name the Pope who would reign at the outset of World War II, but fail to identify the white-clad bishop executed by a band of soldiers outside the devastated city, leaving the seers with only an “impression” that it is the Holy Father?

Or is it the Holy Father? Are the white-clad bishop and the Holy Father one and the same person or are they two different people? Bear in mind that, for the first time in Church history, there are indeed two “bishops dressed in white” living in the Vatican enclave, both of whom are known by papal names, one of whom refers to himself, and is referred to by Pope Bergoglio, as “Pope Emeritus.”

What are we to make of the fact that Pope Bergoglio has apparently placed himself into the post-apocalyptic scenario depicted in the vision, there being no other plausible explanation for why, at Fatima of all places, he would describe himself with the exact phrase employed in the Third Secret vision? Moreover, if Pope Bergoglio sees himself as the “Bishop dressed in White,” has he not in his own way joined Pope Benedict in discarding Cardinal Sodano’s ridiculous “interpretation” that the white-clad bishop being executed by soldiers is John Paul II not being executed by a lone assassin? Does he have reason to believe that he is the white-clad bishop who meets with death on one of the hills outside a devastated city of Rome?

Yet again we see why there simply must be a text in which the Virgin Herself explains the meaning and significance of each detail of the enigmatic vision, just as She did with the rest of the Message of Fatima. Among other things, She would of course have clarified the “impression” that the bishop executed in the vision is the Pope.

As things now stand, the “Third Secret” the Vatican has presented to the world — the vision standing alone — has produced nothing but dueling interpretations rather than the certain guidance the Mother of God surely wanted to provide the Church and the world. No, something is missing. And sooner or later it will be revealed.

http://www.fatimaperspectives.com/fe/perspective1007.asp

My Comment : He said it himself, “he is the Bishop dressed in White”, thanks to the Holy Spirit, I felt (Thanks to our Lady) Something related to the Centenary of Fatima will happen, between us I was hoping some sign from Heaven or some event which could confirm my work or not and this news is even more than I was expected, my friends we are living an incredible time, you cannot imagine, working on this text of 25 lines (the 3rd Secret) for years, I measure myself how important this announcement is, which is an additional mockery to be clear from those behind the walls who decided to bury our Lady of Fatima for ever and have infiltrated Rome to the Top, to me this news is also a key event in the timetable of the Fatima 3rd Secret, Pride will lose them and the Promised Triumph will be ours, please be sure of that.

 

Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us !

23 May 2017

PART 6 Cardinal Burke

Cardinal Burke’s Historic Address on the
Consecration of Russia and the Third Secret

by Christopher A. Ferrara
May 22, 2017

In my column of April 24, I expressed the view that “the laity must take the lead in speaking the truth about our situation” in the midst of this endlessly turbulent pontificate because “it is certain there is no help on the way from the Princes of the Church.”

I am very happy to abandon that opinion where Cardinal Raymond Burke is concerned. I have already reported here that at the just-concluded Rome Life Forum, which met to address the growing Bergoglian crisis post-Amoris Laetitia, Cardinal Burke called for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary with these words:

“Certainly, Pope Saint John Paul II consecrated the world, including Russia, to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on March 25, 1984. But, today, once again, we hear the call of Our Lady of Fatima to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, in accord with her explicit instruction.”

Publication of the full text of his address by LifeSiteNews, however, reveals that the Cardinal was not suggesting that the 1984 ceremony effected Russia’s consecration, which should merely be done again, but rather that the consecration Our Lady requested was not done in the first place. Quoth the Cardinal:

“In fact, the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary did not take place, as she requested, and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays did not become the practice of the universal Church.”

For decades, Father Nicholas Gruner was mocked and marginalized for insisting upon this obvious truth. But now a Prince of the Church has declared it to the world without equivocation. May God bless him for it.

But there is something just as important in this historic address. While being prudent about his manner of expression, Cardinal Burke implicitly confirms that the Vatican has not disclosed the entirety of the Third Secret. The relevant passages merit quotation at length (bolding and paragraph breaks added for readability):

“The third part of the Secret, indicated by the “etc.” at the end of the second part, has to deal with the spiritual chastisement brought about by the rebellion of man who instead of giving his heart to the Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary gives over his heart to the corruption of the worldly materialism and relativism of the age…

“Without entering into a discussion regarding whether the third part of the Secret has been fully revealed, it seems clear from the most respected studies of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, that it has to do with the diabolical forces unleashed upon the world in our time and entering into the very life of the Church which lead souls away from the truth of the faith and, therefore, from the Divine Love flowing from the glorious pierced Heart of Jesus. Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité, in his monumental study of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, writes the following regarding the third part of the Secret or what is often called the Third Secret:

“‘In short, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary undoubtedly refers much more to the third Secret than even the second. For the recovery of peace will be a gift from Heaven, but it is not, properly speaking, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Her victory is of another order, supernatural, and then temporal by addition. It will first be the victory of the Faith, which will put an end to the time of apostasy, and the great shortcomings of the Church’s pastors.’

“As horrible as are the physical chastisements associated with man’s disobedient rebellion before God, infinitely more horrible are the spiritual chastisements for they have to do with the fruit of grievous sin: eternal death….

“The teaching of the Faith in its integrity and with courage is the heart of the office of the Church’s pastors: the Roman Pontiff, the Bishops in communion with the See of Peter, and their principal co-workers, the priests. For that reason, the Third Secret is directed, with particular force, to those who exercise the pastoral office in the Church.

“Their failure to teach the faith, in fidelity to the Church’s constant teaching and practice, whether through a superficial, confused or even worldly approach, and their silence endangers mortally, in the deepest spiritual sense, the very souls for whom they have been consecrated to care spiritually.

“The poisonous fruits of the failure of the Church’s pastors is seen in a manner of worship, of teaching and of moral discipline which is not in accord with Divine Law.”

As we can see, Cardinal Burke — undoubtedly with the Bergoglian tumult in view — has essentially adopted the position of the long-derided “Fatimites,” especially Father Gruner, even citing Father Gruner’s internationally promoted primary source: Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité’s “monumental study of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima.” In particular, the Cardinal affirms:

• • that the Third Secret begins with Our Lady’s reference to Portugal, ending with Lucia’s famous “etc.” indicating further words of the Virgin;

• • that the Secret predicts a terrible crisis of faith and discipline — a veritable apostasy — involving “the failure of the Church’s pastors” from the Pope on down to “teach the faith, in fidelity to the Church’s constant teaching and practice” — a clear reference to Amoris Laetitia, among many other disastrous hierarchical departures from Tradition over the past fifty years;

• that the resulting spiritual chastisement is “infinitely more horrible” than the material chastisement seen in the vision published in 2000.

Now, none of what the Cardinal affirms pertaining to the contents of the Secret is seen in the vision of the “Bishop dressed in White” standing alone, where one sees only an attack on the Church from enemies without in the midst of a post-apocalyptic scenario involving a material chastisement. Rather, these elements, as he himself declares, must be found in the words of the Virgin for which Sister Lucia held the place with that telltale “etc.” — those three little letters that have bedeviled the Vatican apparatus since 2000, which it pointedly refuses to address. It is precisely those precious words that the Vatican has withheld from us.

The Cardinal’s courageous declarations are all the more remarkable in that they represent a substantial reversal of his previous position on the Fatima event. (There is no need to dredge up those details now.) This change of mind and heart is a testimony to the Cardinal’s intellectual honesty and his love for the Church and, above all, for souls.

Every Catholic should pray for the well being of Cardinal Raymond Burke and for the emergence of many other cardinals who will emulate his profile in courage. For humanly speaking (absent a direct divine intervention of the most drastic sort), it is first and foremost the Princes of the Church who must defend her against the unparalleled attack from within that she now endures — an attack that stands at the heart of the Third Secret of Fatima.

ADDENDUM: I cannot fail to mention the important contribution of Cardinal Caffarra at the same conference. In his address he declared: “We are no longer witnesses, but deserters, if we do not speak openly and publicly… I have spoken frequently of a confrontation… assuming the appearance of a trial, of a legal proceeding, in which the defendant is Jesus and his Gospel. As in every legal proceeding, there are also witnesses in favour: in favour of Jesus and his Gospel. Announcement of the Gospel of Marriage and of Life today takes place in a context of hostility, of challenge, of unbelief.”

http://www.fatimaperspectives.com/fe/perspective1013.asp

My Comment :

10 More questions about Fatima and my personnal researchs

29. Does the Secret speak of an Anti-Pope ? probably or unfortunately, my researchs are very clear with this sensitive topic, our Lady probably warns the Church so the World of this risk, in other words the great Apostasy will begin at the Top

30. What does it mean ? The Great Apostasy could not have begun without the negligence or disobedience of some Popes de facto one of them should be also that Pope in question

31. Did the Secret was intented only for the Pope ? Yes and No, The secret is a strong Warning and concerns first of all the Catholic Church (in the sense of extra ecclasiam nulla salus) so de facto the World, the Catholic Church being the only possible door to Heaven and Salvation

32. Is this Anti-Pope topic the main reason of the non-disclosure of the Secret ? Yes probably and especially from the Year 1960

33. Why 1960 ? This year was the deadline to reveal the 3rd Secret

34. Did Rome lie in 2000 ? They revealed the 3rd Secret Vision only but not the text explaining that Vision, the so Called 3rd Secret of 25 Lines, de facto they lied, simple as that

35. Why ? Probably because of the content of the text explaining that Vision, in other words, they doubted the veracity of the Text because a part concerns the Magisterium and especially the Papacy

36. Is the Bishop in White an Anti-Pope or a false Pope ? Yes Probably

37.  Which Pope will Consecrate Russia ? We don’t know which Pope but First of all a valid Pope, in my opinion but this is my opinion only, Pope Benedict or the successor of Pope Francis, in any case we are probably very close to a Consecration as we can read via Cardinal Burke, a Great Prince of the Church and May God Bless him, mentalities change before the facts, in other words the Triumph is on the way and the time to be silent is probably over

38. Will the Consecration be done in Rome ? I don’t think so, to me in Fatima, some told me in Moscow, we can’t be sure and time will tell only.

 

Pray for me Father !

 

10 June 2017

PART 7 Of Fatima and Souls

Written by  Michael McBride

The Human Soul

Each human person was in the Mind of God from all eternity, body and soul.  Each would come into actual existence at the moment of conception, when this unique soul would be infused into its unique body.  Incredibly, beyond our comprehension, each of us was specifically willed by God from all eternity.  And, since the motive for everything which God does is love, He loves that which He creates.  God loves each person that exists.  He desires that this person share His life for all eternity in Heaven.

Pause & ponder, for a moment:  God desires that you personably (and every other human being) share His life forever in unimaginable happiness.

 

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3231-of-fatima-and-souls

My Comment : What a Great Article ! Everything is there, from the irresponsability of the Church and the lost of millions of Souls, this is exactly what I got from my own conclusion during my personnal research about the Fatima 3rd Secret, within few words, We were betrayed by our hierarchy, it tooks me more than a year to recover the peace of Soul without losing my Faith after this conclusion but let read again this irresponsability within what is to me the most important part of this article :

What if …?

What if the Consecration had taken place shortly after Our Lady stipulated, on June 13, 1929, how it was to be carried out?  Russia would certainly have been converted to the Catholic Church and an era of peace would have been granted the world.  How long an era of peace?  At least long enough to be significant and noticeable.  That would, perhaps, have meant no Spanish Civil War, no Second World War, and (speaking for Americans alone) no Korean War, no Vietnam, no Bosnia, no Gulf War, no Afghanistan, no Iraq, no war in Syria, not to mention the many other regional wars which have since taken place in other parts of the world nor the countless terrorist attacks inflicted by various hate-filled groups.  How many souls were lost (and continue to be lost) as a result of these conflicts and the long delay?  Thousands?  Millions?  Uncountable millions?  And remember – each one of these souls was purposely created by God to exist and to experience the divine life with Him for all eternity.  Now?  Now, they are lost for all eternity.  No second chances, no “do-overs”, no reprieves, damned as the souls the children saw in the vision of Hell shown them on July 13, 1917.  What pain and suffering this must continue to cause Our Lord and His Holy Mother!  And the suffering endured by Sister Lucia as a result of the delay!  That these greatly-loved souls have been lost forever!  Need we wonder how it was that Jesus sweated blood in the Garden as He looked down the centuries and saw all those loved ones who would not benefit from the sacrifice He was soon to undergo on the Cross?

“How many souls were lost (and continue to be lost) as a result of these conflicts and the long delay?  Thousands?  Millions?  Uncountable millions?  And remember – each one of these souls was purposely created by God to exist and to experience the divine life with Him for all eternity.”

I learned from the Great Work of Frère Michel, probably one of the Greatest Expert of Fatima with Father Alonso, to me probably the Greatest, I learned from him and my own research, the indeniable irresponsability of each Pope since 1929 to date, including even the Great Pope Pius XII unfortunately, not counting in these wars, the millions of souls lost with abortion, I am telling you, I could not sleep in peace for a long time, and without my Rosary, probably the help of our Lady and Prayers of my readers, I will have lost faith, by the way and for your information, I found back Frère Michel few years ago, still alive but CLOISTERED in a Monastery, so today I am not the same anymore and often on my knees, I am still beating my breast.

 

Aviso